talkstats
06-29-2006, 10:30 AM
There's an interesting controversy in audiophile circles.
I want to compare two groups of subjects. The object is to see if subjects can distinguish between two almost identical headphones - one new, the other "burned-in." (There's currently no empirical research on "burn-in" or "break-in" of stereo headphones, but a blizzard of conjecture.)
Some posters to the audiophile forum have demanded an "ABX" design, with a double-blind. This cannot, however, be a costly study. It looks like the purchase of two or three headphones will be necessary, however.
Which kind of design is most desirable? Which statistical test? How many subjects would be needed to test it fairly?
Thanks in advance for your expertise.
I want to compare two groups of subjects. The object is to see if subjects can distinguish between two almost identical headphones - one new, the other "burned-in." (There's currently no empirical research on "burn-in" or "break-in" of stereo headphones, but a blizzard of conjecture.)
Some posters to the audiophile forum have demanded an "ABX" design, with a double-blind. This cannot, however, be a costly study. It looks like the purchase of two or three headphones will be necessary, however.
Which kind of design is most desirable? Which statistical test? How many subjects would be needed to test it fairly?
Thanks in advance for your expertise.