+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: One way ANOVA vs Kruskal-Wallis

  1. #1
    Points: 1,847, Level: 25
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 53

    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Unhappy One way ANOVA vs Kruskal-Wallis



    Hi Guys,

    I have three grous and their distribution is not normaly distributed so I decided to use Kruskal-Wallis rather than One way ANOVA. The annoying thing is that Kruskal-Wallis tells if there is/isn't a significant difference between the three groups but does not tell from where the difference come if there is. In other words, is the difference (if there is) is between group 1 and 2 or 1 and 3 or 2 and 3. Any ideas how to know these info?

    Many thanks in advance
    Ali

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Points: 8,565, Level: 62
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Dragan's Avatar
    Location
    Illinois, US
    Posts
    1,723
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 127 Times in 113 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by stat_18 View Post
    Hi Guys,

    I have three grous and their distribution is not normaly distributed so I decided to use Kruskal-Wallis rather than One way ANOVA. The annoying thing is that Kruskal-Wallis tells if there is/isn't a significant difference between the three groups but does not tell from where the difference come if there is. In other words, is the difference (if there is) is between group 1 and 2 or 1 and 3 or 2 and 3. Any ideas how to know these info?

    Many thanks in advance
    Ali
    In terms of a post-hoc analysis for the Kruskal-Wallis test, have a look at this:

    http://www.talkstats.com/showthread.php?t=4894

  3. #3
    Points: 1,847, Level: 25
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 53

    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks Dragan. You mean if |RBari - RBarj| >= the right side term, then the two groups are significantly different. is this what you meant to say?

    Many thanks
    Ali

  4. #4
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,245, Level: 72
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 205
    gianmarco's Avatar
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    722
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 93 Times in 71 Posts
    Hi,
    every stat pack should routinely provide a post-hoc test performing pair-wise comparisons to' assess where the significant difference is.

    I am familiar with software like xlstat, statistica, sigmaplot, and they all provide such comparisons. If you want to try a free one, go and search for the program PAST.

    Regards.
    Gm

  5. #5
    Points: 1,619, Level: 23
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 81

    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Primarily, you should use ANOVA, because the distribution is normal,then if you want to compare the means between these groups,you should use post hoc comparisons, you can occur that by many package programme like SPSS,you can use Tukey and Scheffe test for this

  6. #6
    Super Moderator
    Points: 8,565, Level: 62
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Dragan's Avatar
    Location
    Illinois, US
    Posts
    1,723
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 127 Times in 113 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by stat_18 View Post
    Thanks Dragan. You mean if |RBari - RBarj| >= the right side term, then the two groups are significantly different. is this what you meant to say?

    Many thanks
    Ali
    Yes, that's right.

  7. #7
    Points: 1,847, Level: 25
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 53

    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Thanks Guys for all of your suggestions.

    I have one more question please. I have set of data that compares 5 measures between three group of patients. I need to compare measurement A between the three groups. Then do the same thing for all other measuemnts. So which test I should use. is there any restriction regarding the normality (ie if measurement A is normally distributed use x test, if not normally distributed use y test).

    Many thanks
    Ali

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Reference wanted (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA)
    By neoneszti in forum Statistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-06-2010, 12:47 PM
  2. Is Kruskal Wallis the right test to use?
    By August 15 in forum Statistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2010, 05:43 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-06-2009, 08:21 AM
  4. Should I use Kruskal-Wallis?
    By brian in forum Statistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 03:02 AM
  5. The Kruskal-Wallis Test
    By Keikle08 in forum Statistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-11-2008, 09:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats