Just a quick question. The gamma gets parameterized in different ways. Which way are you using? Is the expected value of your gamma 3 or is it 1/3?
Just a quick question. The gamma gets parameterized in different ways. Which way are you using? Is the expected value of your gamma 3 or is it 1/3?
Ah. Then yes you should really tell us that info because apparently your parameterization is different than the two I was thinking of. To me you have alpha and beta mixed up using the first parameterization I was thinking of. But that doesn't matter too much.
The next step is realizing that since these are independent and share the same parameters you can figure out the distribution of the sum.
yes the sum follows a gamma (1,3n) in my notation (that is, expectation is 1/3n). right?
Expectation is still 3n. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution. Once I saw the way you parameterize it and how the distribution looks I understand what's going on. All that's happening is you're putting what I call alpha in the second parameter spot, which is where I would put what I call beta. Wikipedia uses different parameter names but it agrees with me. The expectation is the product of the parameters in both our cases. 1*(3n) = (3n)*1 = 3n.
yes. sorry i was wrong. it was a mistake...
what now?
i am writing gamma(alpha, p). i mistakenly wrote the expectation as alpha/p,, which is actually p/alpha. clear?
sorry for the confusion
No need to worry. From there I'm not exactly sure where it should go but it does simplify the problem I believe. It looks like Chebyshev's inequality might help but I can't guarantee that that'll work perfectly for you. I'd have to get out some paper and try things out myself. Have you learned chebyshev's inequality?
yes i have.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_ineq...and_the_median
Letbe the median of
Here using the Chebyshev's/Jensen's Inequality, we get
Then,
![]()
|
|