+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Lognormally distributed

  1. #1
    Points: 1,150, Level: 18
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 50

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Exclamation Lognormally distributed



    Help please I am stuck.

    The rate of return on Your portfolio, R, has a mean value of 1% and a standard deviation of 5%. Suppose that (1 + R) is lognormally distributed.

    1) Calculate at what level of rate of return y, the probability that R is less than or equal to y is equal to 10%.

    2) Calculate the probability that R is greater than 10%.

    P.S. I undarstand that the shape of a lognormall distribution is skeewed to the left. But do not understand how to solve this. Is there a trick to simplify this to a normal distribution? If so please help and explain it to me. Thank you.

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,804, Level: 78
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    2,292
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 371 Times in 351 Posts

    Re: Lognormally distributed

    Several things you may need to know:

    1. If 1 + R \sim \mathrm{log}\mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2),
    then \ln(1 + R) \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-nor...dard_deviation

    2. If 1 + R \sim \mathrm{log}\mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2),
    then E[1 + R] = \exp\left\{\mu + \frac {\sigma^2} {2}\right\},
Var[1 + R] = (\exp\{\sigma^2\} - 1)\exp\{2\mu + \sigma^2\}

    3. Since you know the mean and variance of the log normal distribution,
    you may solve the parameters \mu, \sigma^2 and thus
    you can convert any problem about the probability of a lognormal random
    variable into a problem about the normal random variable.

  3. #3
    Points: 1,150, Level: 18
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 50

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Lognormally distributed

    Quote Originally Posted by BGM View Post
    Several things you may need to know:

    1. If 1 + R \sim \mathrm{log}\mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2),
    then \ln(1 + R) \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-nor...dard_deviation

    2. If 1 + R \sim \mathrm{log}\mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2),
    then E[1 + R] = \exp\left\{\mu + \frac {\sigma^2} {2}\right\},
Var[1 + R] = (\exp\{\sigma^2\} - 1)\exp\{2\mu + \sigma^2\}

    3. Since you know the mean and variance of the log normal distribution,
    you may solve the parameters \mu, \sigma^2 and thus
    you can convert any problem about the probability of a lognormal random
    variable into a problem about the normal random variable.
    I solved the equestion for E[1+R] and Var[1+R], by inputing mu=0.01 and sigma=0.05.

    So I got
    E[1+R]=1.012578452
    Var[1+R]=0.002560086

    But I don't understand how to go from here. I am asked to find (R<y)=10%

    But I do not have E[R] and Var[R] values, and I am not sure how I can convert

    E[1+R] in to E[R], and Var[1+R] into Var[R].

    Maybe I do not full understand somthing, if u see where I went wrong in my thought process, please point it out. Thank you for the help. This question is bugging me very much.

  4. #4
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,804, Level: 78
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    2,292
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 371 Times in 351 Posts

    Re: Lognormally distributed


    The parameters I typed \mu, \sigma^2 are not the mean
    and variance of R.
    They are the mean and variance of \ln(1 + R)

    So the first thing you should know

    E[1 + R] = 1 + E[R] = 1 + 1\%, Var[1 + R] = Var[R] = (5\%)^2

    Next, solve for the \mu, \sigma^2 which is a two equations
    with two unknowns. It is easy. You can either look for the solution at the
    wikipedia, or consider E[1 + R]^2

    After obtaining the parameters, note that \ln function is a
    strictly increasing function, and the inequality will preserve. So the required
    probability \Pr\{R < y\} = 10\% and \Pr\{R > 10\%\} is easy once you have access to the normal CDF.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-08-2011, 04:10 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-16-2010, 08:00 AM
  3. Can age be treated as normally distributed?
    By rtyrtyrtyus in forum Statistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-08-2010, 12:30 AM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-28-2009, 05:18 AM
  5. Rayleigh Distributed?
    By mprathap in forum Statistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-05-2009, 11:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats