
Originally Posted by
bgaynes
We have done a survy evaluating quality of vision following cataract surgery. We used an instrument previously validated by the NIH on normal people without cataracts. The scores range from 0 (unhappy) to 100 (very happy) in categories such as vision comfort, clarity etc. Interestingly, the means for each category from our study are very close to the means from the large population survey done by the NIH. Could we be seeing a "regression to the mean" effect with our sample?