+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: regression to the mean

  1. #1
    Points: 1,516, Level: 22
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 84

    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    regression to the mean



    We have done a survy evaluating quality of vision following cataract surgery. We used an instrument previously validated by the NIH on normal people without cataracts. The scores range from 0 (unhappy) to 100 (very happy) in categories such as vision comfort, clarity etc. Interestingly, the means for each category from our study are very close to the means from the large population survey done by the NIH. Could we be seeing a "regression to the mean" effect with our sample?

  2. #2
    RotParaTon
    Points: 46,245, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Discussion EnderPosting AwardFrequent PosterCommunity AwardMaster Tagger
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    9,080
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 1,607 Times in 1,377 Posts

    Re: regression to the mean

    I'm not exactly sure "regression to the mean" applies in this situation. It just sounds like what you're describing is that the group of post cataract surgery people tend to on average have similar vision scores compared to normal people.

    For more on what "regression to the mean" actually describes you could read the wikipedia article.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Dason For This Useful Post:

    bgaynes (06-17-2011)

  4. #3
    Points: 1,516, Level: 22
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 84

    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: regression to the mean

    Quote Originally Posted by Dason View Post
    I'm not exactly sure "regression to the mean" applies in this situation. It just sounds like what you're describing is that the group of post cataract surgery people tend to on average have similar vision scores compared to normal people.

    For more on what "regression to the mean" actually describes you could read the wikipedia article.
    OK, I will take a look.

  5. #4
    Ninja say what!?!
    Points: 8,297, Level: 61
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 153
    Link's Avatar
    Posts
    1,165
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 82 Times in 75 Posts

    Re: regression to the mean

    Just for kicks...would you mind defining your definition of "regression to the mean" (or looking it up) for us?

  6. #5
    Points: 1,493, Level: 21
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 7

    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts

    Re: regression to the mean


    Quote Originally Posted by bgaynes View Post
    We have done a survy evaluating quality of vision following cataract surgery. We used an instrument previously validated by the NIH on normal people without cataracts. The scores range from 0 (unhappy) to 100 (very happy) in categories such as vision comfort, clarity etc. Interestingly, the means for each category from our study are very close to the means from the large population survey done by the NIH. Could we be seeing a "regression to the mean" effect with our sample?
    I dont know anything about your sample so making any kind of inference would be impossible without that. However might this simply suggest that on average people after cataract surgery have pretty normal vision? I would also look carefully at the instrument. Ideally you would want the subjects in your sample to use the instrument before and after the surgery.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats