+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 95% ci

  1. #1
    Points: 659, Level: 13
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 41

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    95% ci




    Hi I am trying to interpret a journal article about the results of whether drinking cokes leads to child hyperactivity, the sample taken from a group of children where there are three sub groups as: never drink, drink 1-2 times/week and more than 1-2 times/week
    the baseline is set at those who never drink.
    The result goes as follows:

    Hyperactivity:
    Never 13.4
    Light 10.1
    Heavy 12.6

    I want to know why when they calculate the OR, using the never group as baseline, the OR for light group 0.73 (0.58 to 0.91) and the OR for heavy is 0.92 (0.61 to 1.39). What I got for light group is 10.1/13.4 = 0.75 and for heavy group was 12.6/13.4 = 0.94

    Also, how to they calculate the CI?
    Thanks

  2. #2
    Ninja say what!?!
    Points: 8,297, Level: 61
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 153
    Link's Avatar
    Posts
    1,165
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 84 Times in 76 Posts

    Re: 95% ci

    It's weird that they would calculate OR's, when RR's would be fine here. What you calculated was the RR (relative risk). Odds ratios are calculated as the ratio of Odds, which requires probabilities (or odds) of an event. There's probably something you're missing.

  3. #3
    Fortran must die
    Points: 58,790, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    noetsi's Avatar
    Posts
    6,532
    Thanks
    692
    Thanked 915 Times in 874 Posts

    Re: 95% ci


    What method is being used (the only one I know that uses it is logistic regression)?

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats