+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Sample size - chi-squared vs. normal

  1. #1
    Points: 558, Level: 11
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 42

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Sample size - chi-squared vs. normal



    Hi,

    I apologise if this is the wrong thread.

    I need to calculate sample sizes, but I'm curious as to why the commonly used Krejcie-Morgan tables use a chi-squared formula rather than a student-t or a normal distribution. I see quite a few other papers that use the latter distributions instead. Is this related to an assumption about the population following a normal distribution?

    Thank you!

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,821, Level: 78
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 29

    Posts
    2,296
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 372 Times in 351 Posts

    Re: Sample size - chi-squared vs. normal

    After searching a while, seems that the formula is coming from constructing the confidence interval for proportion in a small sample, using hypergeometric distribution to model the observations, and using normal approximations for the hypergeometric distribution as well. Thats why you come up the square of normal quantile (which is the chi-square quantile).

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to BGM For This Useful Post:

    pangel (11-18-2011)

  4. #3
    Points: 558, Level: 11
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 42

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Sample size - chi-squared vs. normal


    Thank you - could you link me to some explanations/steps on this?

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats