1. ## Martingale

I must find an appropriate value so that the sequence constitutes a martingale wrt {X_n}.

I have attached the problem so it is easier to read then typing it here.

I understand the definition of martingale I am just not understanding how to get what the problem is asking. I feel like they are asking to condition on Y_n and if so I am having trouble understanding how to do that. Any kind of help would be appreciated.

2. ## Re: Martingale

Do you know latex? The forum supports latex in the form of $Put latex here$ type tags.

What is giving you the most trouble? What have you done so far? What would it mean for Yn to be a martingale? We want to see that you've put some effort into this.

3. ## Re: Martingale

I'm sorry I don't know latex, I attached the problem as a word document, otherwise it would have been a headache for anyone to read.

Regarding the question,

I know the definition of a martingale. Its a stochastic process such that the conditional expected value of an observation at some time t , given all the observations up to some earlier time s, is equal to the observation at that earlier time s.

i.e. it's expected value of the next observation is/should be the same expected value of the current observation independent of the history.

I need to find a value for a that makes Y_n a martingale wrt to {X_n}

Y_n= a*X_n+ X_n-1. n>=1 Y_0=X_0

I am not sure how to start showing that Y_n constitutes a martingale wrt {X_n}.
or how you would find a value for a to make Y_n be a martingale wrt {X_n}

Any help would be appreciated.

4. ## Re: Martingale

For Y_n to be a martingale it would have to satisfy E[Yn] is finite and E[Y_n+1|X1,...Xn]= Yn. I think I am just not seeing this application to my problem, forgive me I can lack some common sense sometimes.

5. ## Re: Martingale

You say that you know you need to check

So what can you do? Replace by the expression of s and then use the given fact of the conditional expectation of those s ...

6. ## Re: Martingale

So,

or this isn't what you were getting at.

8. ## The Following User Says Thank You to BGM For This Useful Post:

LED2127 (04-02-2012)

9. ## Re: Martingale

if I replace the by

with the law of total probability

now to find a:

10. ## Re: Martingale

On one hand you know ,
on the other hand you should know ?

11. ## Re: Martingale

So
if a=0

then

is that what you mean

12. ## Re: Martingale

Ok more direct:

13. ## Re: Martingale

I'm never sure if you're continuing something from the previous line or going off on a new line of thought. You're stating things without giving reasons - sometimes I'm not sure if you're just saying what you want to show or you're assuming what you want to show. For example in post #8 are your first two lines connected or were you just writing unconnected thoughts?

14. ## Re: Martingale

I'm sorry if my posts aren't clear I will write them more clearly from now on. I appreciate anyone who takes the time to help.

15. ## Re: Martingale

Is it correct if I do the following:

Given

and if this is correct and equate it to what is given :

I obtain:

and further a=1

16. ## Re: Martingale

The first two lines are fine and is what the question asking you to do.

Have you forgotten the question? Why not use the properties given for the conditional expectation of on the third line??