+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Significance level / I didn't make my own thread

  1. #1
    Points: 250, Level: 4
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 50

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Significance level / I didn't make my own thread



    I am doing a pearson product moment correlation but the results come with alpha=0.01. Can I change it to 0.05?

  2. #2
    FormerlyKnownAsRaptor
    Points: 24,380, Level: 95
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 970
    trinker's Avatar
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    3,167
    Thanks
    882
    Thanked 550 Times in 498 Posts

    Re: Significance Level

    Alpha is what you set. P value is what the computer calculates as the significance level. You (the researcher) compares the pvalue to your alpha. If's less than your alpha the results are significant.
    "If you torture the data long enough it will eventually confess."
    -Ronald Harry Coase -

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to trinker For This Useful Post:

    ajpnaveen (04-07-2012)

  4. #3
    Points: 610, Level: 12
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 40

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Significance Level

    Just a couple of quick points.

    You can have any Alpha level you like. In reality a large majority of people use 0.05 through tradition and custom. There is no statistical reason that I can see that we use 0.05 rather than 0.01 or 0.1

    A result may be statistically significant but a little bit of common sense can go a long way in determining the practical significance of a result.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Ventures For This Useful Post:

    ajpnaveen (04-07-2012)

  6. #4
    RotParaTon
    Points: 46,233, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Discussion EnderPosting AwardFrequent PosterCommunity AwardMaster Tagger
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    9,077
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 1,607 Times in 1,377 Posts

    Re: Significance level / I didn't make my own thread

    I moved the discussion to its own thread since it wasn't related to the thread you posted in.
    "His programming is malfunctioning. It begins! Get your weapons, he's going to become a killbot!!!" - bryangoodrich

  7. #5
    FormerlyKnownAsRaptor
    Points: 24,380, Level: 95
    Level completed: 3%, Points required for next Level: 970
    trinker's Avatar
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    3,167
    Thanks
    882
    Thanked 550 Times in 498 Posts

    Re: Significance level / I didn't make my own thread


    Quote Originally Posted by Ventures
    There is no statistical reason that I can see that we use 0.05 rather than 0.01 or 0.1
    I would disagree slightly with this point. It is true that .05 is convention but the alpha level is the researcher's accepted threshold for making a type I error. This should be set with each experiment a priori, and really depends on numerous things, such as previous research in the area, use of results etc. but is sometimes influenced by a researcher's need to be published a posteriori. So, I'd say in a hamburger taste test a researcher chosen .1 may be fine but for a new cancer drug we'd want to see .05 or .01 alpha level. Sometimes alpha is called the confidence level. This is perhaps a better name for alpha as it better describes what it is.
    "If you torture the data long enough it will eventually confess."
    -Ronald Harry Coase -

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to trinker For This Useful Post:

    ajpnaveen (04-07-2012)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats