+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: set question from Goldberg's book

  1. #1
    Points: 186, Level: 3
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 14

    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    set question from Goldberg's book



    I am working my way through Goldberg's Probability: An Introduction and am stuck on problem 4.13, chapter 2. The problem states: "Let E and F be any two events. Suppose the numbers P(E), P(F), and p(E \cap F) are known. Find numbers for these terms for the following probabilities:... P(E' \cup F)."

    I can only get as far as:

    P(E' \cap F) = P(E') + P(F) - P(E' \cap F) = 1 - P(E) + P(F) - P(E' \cap P(F))

    I have no idea how to convert the right most part, the intersection of the compliment of E and F into the knowns. I have tried DeMorgan's laws with no help.

    Oh, the answer in the back of the book is:

    1-P(E) + P(E \cap F)

  2. #2
    RotParaTon
    Points: 46,159, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Discussion EnderPosting AwardFrequent PosterCommunity AwardMaster Tagger
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    9,066
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,375 Posts

    Re: set question from Goldberg's book

    Quote Originally Posted by ptremblay View Post

    I can only get as far as:

    P(E' \cap F) = P(E') + P(F) - P(E' \cap F) = 1 - P(E) + P(F) - P(E' \cap P(F))
    I'm assuming your left hand side is supposed to be P(E' \cup F)

    I like your first step. The second step I like one part of it (writing P(E') = 1-P(E)) but I don't like the very last part (how can an event be intersected with a probability?)

    One hint I'll give is that hopefully you can recall that
    F = (F \cap E) \cup (F \cap E') and that F\cap E and F \cap E' are disjoint. So turn that into a probability statement and see if you can use that to finish up what you want to show.
    "His programming is malfunctioning. It begins! Get your weapons, he's going to become a killbot!!!" - bryangoodrich

  3. #3
    Points: 186, Level: 3
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 14

    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: set question from Goldberg's book


    Woops! I should double check my work. Meant to write:

    P(E' \cup F) = P(E') + P(F) - P(E' \cap F) = 1 - P(E) + P(F) - P(E' \cap F)

    The text book did not give either of your identities. So:

    1 - P(E) + P(F) - P(E' \cap F) = 1 - P(E) + P ((F \cap E) \cup (F \cap E'))  - P(E' \cap F)

    = 1 - P(E) + P(F \cap E)  +  P(F \cap E') - P((F\cap E)  \cap P(F \cap E')) - P(E' \cap F)

    = 1 - P(E) + P(F \cap E) - P(E' \cap F) + P(E' \cap F)  - P((F\cap E)  \cap P(F \cap E'))

    = 1 - P(E) + P(F \cap E) - 0 - 0

    = 1 - P(E) + P(F \cap E)

    I never would have gotten this without your help, since, as I stated, the book did not give the identities. (I hate when textbooks give you problems they haven't readied you to solve.)

    Thanks!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats