# Thread: Hypergeometric distribution - expected value derivation

1. ## Hypergeometric distribution - expected value derivation

Hello,

I just had a question regarding deriving the expected value of the Hypergeometric(N,M,n) distribution. I know that the expected value is nM/N. So, I used the standard definition for determining expected value for discrete distribution (ie. )

So far, I have been able to extract the nM/N from the main term as shown below, but this would mean that the remaining sum would need to equal 1. How would I be able to prove this?

Thanks.

2. ## Re: Hypergeometric distribution - expected value derivation

You're approaching this in the wrong way. In short, change variables where k = x - 1. Further, let M = N1 where N1 + N2 = N as follows:

3. ## Re: Hypergeometric distribution - expected value derivation

Right. The straightforward way to derive this value is to set up the weighted sum as you've done, fiddle with the binomial coefficients a bit to absorb the summation variable into one of them and then realize that you're staring at an instance of Vandermonde's identity.

A slicker way that doesn't involve this nasty-looking sum is to use indicator random variables and take advantage of symmetry. Hint: consider the r.v.s I_k which indicate that the kth draw was one of the M possible "successes."

4. ## Re: Hypergeometric distribution - expected value derivation

Originally Posted by amd
Right. The straightforward way to derive this value is to set up the weighted sum as you've done,...
Well, no, it is not easier. Rather, it is easier to derive the expectation by using the following fact:

where

and it is understood that if .

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts