+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: test to use when comparing two un-even data sets, non-parametric?

  1. #16
    Beep
    Points: 63,267, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    11,315
    Thanks
    266
    Thanked 2,202 Times in 1,881 Posts

    Re: test to use when comparing two un-even data sets, non-parametric?




    Quote Originally Posted by incubusfanclm View Post
    50 times. which is maybe why the undetermined values are set to 50.
    I'm guessing that's probably why.

    Any ideas on why sequence x is apparently more likely to not be present than sequence y (or at least present at detectable amounts)?
    Morte a tutti i raptors
    001100010010011110100001101101110011

  2. #17
    Points: 81, Level: 1
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 19

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: test to use when comparing two un-even data sets, non-parametric?

    it is more randomly spread through the genome.

    so is there any way to replace the undetermined values with some number that won't skew the data? i was thinking some kind of censoring algorithm. maybe "MLE" or something like that? i'm not experienced enough with stats to do this on my own. thanks.

  3. #18
    Beep
    Points: 63,267, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    11,315
    Thanks
    266
    Thanked 2,202 Times in 1,881 Posts

    Re: test to use when comparing two un-even data sets, non-parametric?

    Quote Originally Posted by incubusfanclm View Post
    so is there any way to replace the undetermined values with some number that won't skew the data? i was thinking some kind of censoring algorithm.
    Is it guaranteed that if you tried for long enough that you would eventually get a hit on sequence x. Say you were allowed to go indefinitely and the machine could just keep duplicating the DNA - are you guaranteeing that sequence X will be recognized eventually? If so then modeling it as censored would work - but it would only make things look worse than just treating it as 50. It might make sense to do some mixture model but I wouldn't feel comfortable proposing a model without understanding the underlying mechanics of the situation better.

    maybe "MLE" or something like that? i'm not experienced enough with stats to do this on my own. thanks.
    MLE stands for maximum likelihood estimation (or estimate depending on what exactly we're talking about) but that's an estimation procedure. It doesn't just magically solve problems unless we can specify a specific model of interest (and even then it doesn't just magically solve problems).
    Morte a tutti i raptors
    001100010010011110100001101101110011

  4. #19
    Points: 81, Level: 1
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 19

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: test to use when comparing two un-even data sets, non-parametric?


    it is NOT guaranteed that some value would show up for X even if it were allowed to duplicate infinitely, because as i said, the sequence is randomly spread. you might have picked up a piece of the genome in that particular repeat that does not contain the sequence.

    altering our techniques/parameters for the assay is out of the question. i'd really just like to know if there is something mathematically that you can do with the 50's. what number can i replace them with? perhaps the average of the Y values? (since it's unlikely that any sequence would be detected higher than that) maybe two standard deviations above the average of the Y values?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats