+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

  1. #1
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?



    Hi,

    As i said in my first topic, I'm a beginner in financial statistics. I read a lot of things about GARCH, but I didn't find a precise response.

    According to this document (pages 4, equation (1) ) :
    http://www.eurojournals.com/jmib_7_01.pdf

    We need a "mean equation" (certainly AR or ARMA model) to formulate a GARCH model. What should I do with this equation ?

    Additional question : Are residuals the differences between the result of this equation and the observed values ?

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Bhoot
    Points: 1,434, Level: 21
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 66

    Posts
    1,759
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 128 Times in 107 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Most of the modelling is based on mean equation. For example regression you could see as E[Y | X]. In stationary time series, mean equation is always AR or ARMA or MA. GARCH modelling is a relationship in variance equation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Latiole View Post
    We need a "mean equation" (certainly AR or ARMA model) to formulate a GARCH model. What should I do with this equation ?

    Additional question : Are residuals the differences between the result of this equation and the observed values ?
    Thanks in advance
    Mean equation part gives forecast. Using the lag structure you can forecast the future periods.
    You are right on the additional question part.

  3. #3
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Thank you very much.

    In concrete terms,when should I use the mean equation ? Is the following process right ? :

    - Returns modelling through an AR model
    - Residuals and then squared residuals calculations
    - Conditional variance following a GARCH model
    - Log likehood function
    - GARCH Parameters estimation by iteration.

    ... or it's totally wrong ?

  4. #4
    Bhoot
    Points: 1,434, Level: 21
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 66

    Posts
    1,759
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 128 Times in 107 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    The steps would be:
    - First ensure the series is stationary.
    - Then build mean equation to make residual is white noise. Use ACF and PACF of residual. At this stage you don't need to check any thing of squared residual.
    - Once the mean equation is done, check the squared residuals ACF or PACF for evidence of GARCH. Fit the mean equation and GARCH parameters estimation by iteration.

    I would suggest Tsay's book for the theory and details of the model building.

  5. #5
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    So to sum up the first step,

    - If the series is stationary (it's the case I verified this with the aide of a KPSS test in Matlab), I can use an AR model.
    - I determine residuals by calculating the difference between the results of the AR model and the real values.

    Even if I understand the function of ACF and PACF, I have some trouble to interpret them. So I will work on these tools.

    Thank you

  6. #6
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Thank you for the book. I got it and it's awesome.

  7. #7
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Hi,

    In the Tsay's book (for the GARCH model), it says

    Code: 
    "let a= r - u be the innovation at time t"
    Is it the difference between the results of the AR model and the observed value ? If no, what's u ?

    Thank you in advance.

  8. #8
    Bhoot
    Points: 1,434, Level: 21
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 66

    Posts
    1,759
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 128 Times in 107 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Latiole View Post
    Hi,

    In the Tsay's book (for the GARCH model), it says

    Code: 
    "let a= r - u be the innovation at time t"
    Is it the difference between the results of the AR model and the observed value ? If no, what's u ?

    Thank you in advance.
    If your mean equation is AR then you are right.

  9. #9
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Ok Thx, so innovation = residuals ?

  10. #10
    Bhoot
    Points: 1,434, Level: 21
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 66

    Posts
    1,759
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 128 Times in 107 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Latiole View Post
    Ok Thx, so innovation = residuals ?
    You can say that.

  11. #11
    Points: 78, Level: 1
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?

    Ok thank you for your answers a sunday
    Last edited by Latiole; 08-19-2012 at 10:40 AM.

  12. #12
    Points: 1,980, Level: 26
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 20
    derksheng's Avatar
    Posts
    247
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts

    Re: [GARCH model] Why do we need a "mean equation" ?


    The mean equation can take the form:

    \boxed{R(t) = \mu + \sum_{i=1}^N a_i R(t-i) + b \sigma(t) + \mathbf{c}\mathbf{X(t)} + \sigma(t) z(t)}

    where a_i are the AR(i) coefficients, b is the coefficient of the garch-in-mean, \mathbf{c} is a row vector of coefficients to some exogenous variables represented by column vector \mathbf{X(t)}, z(t) \sim \overset{iid}{N}(0,1).

    Any of the parameters can be set to zero (this is done by not entering the data into the GARCH estimator).

    EDIT: Also you can have moving average terms in the mean equation.

    The mean equation is simply the hypothesized data generating process of the actual variable that you're modelling. The variance equation is the hypothesized DGP of the mean equation's residual's variance. Without a mean equation the variance equation makes no sense. The reason it makes no sense is because it's the variance equation of the residuals of a specific mean equation (and if this doesn't exist then the variance equation doesn't exist).
    Last edited by derksheng; 01-12-2013 at 06:59 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats