+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

  1. #1
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,702, Level: 73
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 148
    gianmarco's Avatar
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    728
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 95 Times in 72 Posts

    regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper



    Hi,
    I came accross this interesting white paper.
    Here is the link.
    It deals with the topic of the assumptions of traditional t-test and of its comparison with the Welch's t. The pros and cons of each are evaluated.
    I found it in the site of Minitab program. Nonetheless, I think it can prove useful to a more general audience.

    Hope it helps
    Best Regards
    Gm
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx-

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gianmarco For This Useful Post:

    GretaGarbo (09-01-2012), victorxstc (09-01-2012)

  3. #2
    RotParaTon
    Points: 47,119, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Discussion EnderPosting AwardCommunity AwardMaster TaggerFrequent Poster
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    9,185
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 1,640 Times in 1,401 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    Oh man. We did a lab/homework that was investigating essentially everything they went over in that paper in my Stat 601 course. I probably still have my R code lying around if anybody wants to conduct similar simulation studies for themselves in R.
    "His programming is malfunctioning. It begins! Get your weapons, he's going to become a killbot!!!" - bryangoodrich

  4. #3
    Multicollinearity hater
    Points: 6,538, Level: 52
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 12
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    741
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 181 Times in 163 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    Thanks for sharing this nice paper with us
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake

  5. #4
    Banned
    Points: 3,677, Level: 38
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 123
    GretaGarbo's Avatar
    Posts
    429
    Thanks
    146
    Thanked 139 Times in 122 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    Quote Originally Posted by Dason View Post
    I probably still have my R code lying around if anybody wants to conduct similar simulation studies for themselves in R.
    I think it would be really great if Dason shared his code, or part of it, for this.

    This (area) seems to be one of those that are most frequently asked about. “My data is not normally distributed….”. Those who have, say 12 and 17 observations that are slightly skewed could check themselves how sensitive it is.

    edit:
    Thanks Gianmarco for bringing this link.

  6. #5
    RotParaTon
    Points: 47,119, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Discussion EnderPosting AwardCommunity AwardMaster TaggerFrequent Poster
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    9,185
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 1,640 Times in 1,401 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    Actually I just checked and apparently I don't have that code anymore. The server I used for my 601 homework crashed and there were adequate backups made on that one apparently. Since I only used that server for 601 I forgot that it had crashed since I had backups of most other stuff. I could probably recreate most of it fairly easily though.
    "His programming is malfunctioning. It begins! Get your weapons, he's going to become a killbot!!!" - bryangoodrich

  7. #6
    Multicollinearity hater
    Points: 6,538, Level: 52
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 12
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    741
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 181 Times in 163 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    GM, I couldn't find time yet to read it. Just some pages. Could you please tell me according to it, which is better? I am interested particularly because Dason had asked me this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dason View Post
    When doing a t-test do you default to assuming equal variances or unequal variances?
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake

  8. #7
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,702, Level: 73
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 148
    gianmarco's Avatar
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    728
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 95 Times in 72 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    Victorxstc,
    you are welcome.
    You could also read another article I posted some time ago... If I manage to find the thread I will surely point it out to you replying to this thread.
    As to Dason's question, I would suggest to you to assume unequal variance....just to keep on the safe ;-)

    Gm

    Edit: here is the link to the article: GD Ruxton, "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test".
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx-

  9. #8
    Multicollinearity hater
    Points: 6,538, Level: 52
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 12
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    741
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 181 Times in 163 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper

    Hey GM

    Thanks for the second paper

    The title itself is indicative of its advantage over the routine t test So I will switch to using it for usual cases
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake

  10. #9
    Multicollinearity hater
    Points: 6,538, Level: 52
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 12
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    741
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 181 Times in 163 Posts

    Re: regular t-test VS Welch's t: white paper


    That second paper was great I will use Welch t test only (or mostly) from now on
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats