+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Multiple regression analysis or SEM

  1. #1
    Points: 2,998, Level: 33
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 52

    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Multiple regression analysis or SEM



    Hi there,

    I want to find the effect of explanatory variables (factors) such age, job, sex on questionnaires' factors. My question is can I use multiple regression analysis on each factor, or I have to do SEM on three factors??

    Thanks in advance

    Katerina

  2. #2
    Points: 637, Level: 12
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 13

    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

    Re: Multiple regression analysis or SEM

    Hey katerina.

    Did you have a specific effect or a specific model in mind to test?

  3. #3
    Points: 2,998, Level: 33
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 52

    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Multiple regression analysis or SEM

    Hi Chiro,

    I have a specific model to test.
    Basically I got 3 DV correlated and 5 IV (age, job, sex as categorical and studies, days, and hourperday as continuous). and I want to test the effect of my IV on to DV. After those days I posted I decide first to do a MANOVA in order to test which of all my IV are significant and then a correlation of those who left on the model in order to check if there correlation among continuous and categorical and if there are correlation then I will use a MANCOVA model in order to test if the categorical var. is significant having in my mind the covariates.........I am so confused!! Are all of this correct or I have to change my plans???

    Thanks in advance!!!
    Katerina

  4. #4
    Points: 637, Level: 12
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 13

    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

    Re: Multiple regression analysis or SEM

    Do you have a specific model though you want to test?

    Typically if we want to test a model we write something like say Y = B0 + B1*X or Y = B0 + B1*e^(X) or something along those lines. Do you have such a model description?

    Normal regression modelling is one way of fitting data to a specific model and the standard errors amongst other things can tell you how well the fit is for that model: it's not the only way but it is one way.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to chiro For This Useful Post:

    katerina (10-29-2012)

  6. #5
    TS Contributor
    Points: 6,549, Level: 52
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 1
    Lazar's Avatar
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    661
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 164 Times in 149 Posts

    Re: Multiple regression analysis or SEM

    SEM would be a relatively efficent way of doing what you want as everything can be fitted in a single model. Under most conditions the point estimates of a SEM and seperate multiple regressions should be very similar.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Lazar For This Useful Post:

    katerina (10-29-2012)

  8. #6
    Points: 802, Level: 15
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 98

    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Multiple regression analysis or SEM


    I would also favor SEM for the sake of having an integrative model, even more so if your continuous DVs are fallible scores from multi-item inventories that contain some element of measurement error that you can include in the model.
    "Statistics is the Grammar of Science" Karl Pearson

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats