+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: How to present data after Holm-Bonferroni Correction

  1. #1
    Points: 48, Level: 1
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 2

    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    How to present data after Holm-Bonferroni Correction




    Hi all,

    I am manually using Holm-Bonferroni method to correct my data as I can't find a way to do it using software. As the data is relatively small, it is still manageable. The problem is how I should present the data after the correction.

    1) When the null hypothesis is not rejected as the P-value is <0.05 but more than the adjusted α, should I indicate that anywhere or it is alright to just write it off as not significant?

    2) When the null hypothesis is rejected as the P-value is still less than the adjusted α, do the P-value and the *** that represent the significance level still remain the same as before correction?

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Points: 84, Level: 1
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 16

    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: How to present data after Holm-Bonferroni Correction


    Hi Artery,

    If you have a list of p-values that you want to correct for multiple comparisons, it's very easy to do so using R, which is free: just visit CRAN, choose your operating system, and install.

    P-value adjustment is done using the p.adjust command: simply give it a vector of p-values, and it will spit out the adjusted values. This is easier than doing things by hand, and it's also perfectly reproducible.

    Here's some code you can use as an example: You can copy and paste the blue text into R, and modify it to your needs.
    # Hashes denote comments in R - these won't be read by the compiler.
    # First create a vector of your unadjusted p-values:
    # just replace these values with your p-values
    unadjusted <- c(0.026, 0.4772, 0.2029, 0.7272, 0.0325,
    0.0308, 0.005, 0.7094, 0.2216, 0.185)

    # Next, call the p.adjust function
    adjusted <- p.adjust(unadjusted, method = "holm")

    # Now output these side by side, so you can compare
    p.table <- cbind(adjusted, unadjusted)
    p.table


    This should give you the following:
    adjusted unadjusted
    [1,] 0.2340 0.0260
    [2,] 1.0000 0.4772
    [3,] 1.0000 0.2029
    [4,] 1.0000 0.7272
    [5,] 0.2464 0.0325
    [6,] 0.2464 0.0308
    [7,] 0.0500 0.0050
    [8,] 1.0000 0.7094
    [9,] 1.0000 0.2216
    [10,] 1.0000 0.1850

    It's probably easiest just to report the adjusted values, but I have seen the unadjusted values annotated to denote changes in statistical significance. I prefer the former, and will let Andrew Gelman and Hal Stern explain why, as they'll do a much better job than I would.

    HTH

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Asymptotically Unbiased For This Useful Post:

    GretaGarbo (03-29-2013)

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats