+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 30 of 30

Thread: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

  1. #16
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt




    Hi, again.

    My teacher said that I can't use t-test because the conditions of application aren't verified. I really don't know why he said that: my samples are independent and big (N=30). :\

    Would be MANN-WHITNEY-WILCOXON test appropriate?
    Last edited by Badjoras; 04-18-2013 at 01:12 PM.

  2. #17
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    Your teacher probably means the assumption of normality and equal variances. Test for those assumptions. The t-test is robust for non-normality with sample sizes > 30. If the variances are not equal, there is another version of the t-test that does not assume equal variances.
    Last edited by Miner; 04-19-2013 at 06:47 AM. Reason: correct typo

  3. #18
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    So, what test should I use? MWW?

  4. #19
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    What did the tests for normality and equal variances show?

  5. #20
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    The variances are equal and the distribution can be approximated to a normal distribution...

  6. #21
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    Then the data meet the assumptions for using the 2-sample t-test using equal variances. There is no need to use a non-parametric test. Since the non-parametric has only slightly less power for the normal distribution scenario you should get equivalent results using both unless it is a borderline situation.

  7. #22
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    But that's what I used and he said the conditions of application aren't verified. I found out that the MWW test is more widely applicable than independent samples Student's t-test...

    "recommend MWW as the default test for comparing interval or ordinal measurements with similar distributions"
    "MWW will give very similar results to performing an ordinary parametric two-sample t test on the rankings of the data."

  8. #23
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    When he said that, had you demonstrated that you have tested for normality and equal variances? He may have meant that you had not verified the assumptions prior to performing the test.

    The MWW test also has assumptions of similar shape and equal variance, so you still have to verify the assumptions. Furthermore, you should try to use the most powerful test when it is appropriate. The MWW test is more powerful than the 2-sample t-test WHEN the distributions are non-normal. However, the 2-sample t-test is slightly more powerful when the distributions ARE normal.

    It sounds like your teacher just has a bias toward the MWW test.

  9. #24
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    For normality: KS
    For equal variances: F-test

    Right?

  10. #25
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    Correct.

    Anderson-Darling is an alternative to KS. AD is more sensitive to the tail area than KS.

  11. #26
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    My conditions of application are in this Excel Sheet (it's in portuguese, but is easy to understand). I used KS to test normality and I concluded that the distribution can be approximated to a normal distribution (didn't reject H0). Then I used F-test to find out if the variances are equal and H0 isn't rejected. So... you said that t-test is more powerful in this situation. If I put this sheet in my project to explain the conditions of application, do you think my teacher will accept my analysis using 2-sample t-test?
    Attached Files

  12. #27
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    Under the conditions of normality, the effectiveness of the MWW test is 0.95 compared to the 2-sample t-test. It is close, but the t-test does outperform.

    I think that you have done all you need, but I am not your instructor. Instructors are not always reasonable. Boa sorte.

  13. #28
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    The question didn't say that I need to perform a specific test, so I think it's done. Thanks for your useful help!

  14. #29
    Points: 154, Level: 3
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt

    Just one more question: I send him an e-mail and he basically said that I needed to put the conditions of application before performing the test. So I can use the t-test. However, he also said that N=30 is in the limit for a sample be considered big, so I need further information to "justify" this single point.

  15. #30
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Paper Helicopter Experiment Doubt


    The t-test does not have any restriction on the sample size.

    The proper approach is to establish "a priori" the difference in means that you want to detect. That is, a difference that is of "practical" importance. Practical importance is that level that would convince the "powers that be" to provide funding for further research or to make changes. It is that level that would convince someone to change their behavior. Then determine the alpha and power that you desire and calculate the required sample size. That sample size might be 5 or it might be 200.

    The only reason that 30 is ever mentioned is that at n >= 30, the t-test becomes more robust to deviations in normality. However, in your case, the data are normal, so a sample size of 30 is a moot point.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats