+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Mixed Model Nested Anova or Two sample test?

  1. #1
    Points: 26, Level: 1
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 24

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mixed Model Nested Anova or Two sample test?




    Hello Forum Participants,

    My dissertation research evaluates the effect of a hormone on the epithelium. My data was obtained from a clinical trial with a placebo group and 4 different treatment groups. For each group I have pre and post treatment samples but an unequal number of data points.
    I want to compare the pre and post treatment among individuals. The post treatment samples were taken from three different sites of the foreskin, while the pretreatment sample was taken from only one area. Should I use mixed model nested anova for the comparison?
    I also want to compare the placebo group against all of the four treatment groups. Initially I thought that I could use the two sample unpaired, unequal variance test. After reading through information on choosing which statistical test to use, I do not think it is the appropriate test.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 18,889, Level: 87
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 461
    CowboyBear's Avatar
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked 427 Times in 328 Posts

    Re: Mixed Model Nested Anova or Two sample test?

    Repeated measures ANOVA might be the way to go, though it depends on the nature of your measurements. You haven't really described your dependent variable... what characteristic of the epithelium are you measuring?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to CowboyBear For This Useful Post:

    cbell723 (07-03-2013)

  4. #3
    Points: 26, Level: 1
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 24

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Mixed Model Nested Anova or Two sample test?

    I'm measuring the thickness of the skin layer.

  5. #4
    TS Contributor
    Points: 18,889, Level: 87
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 461
    CowboyBear's Avatar
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked 427 Times in 328 Posts

    Re: Mixed Model Nested Anova or Two sample test?

    RM Anova could work then. It does assume normality of the DV within each cell though (5 groups x 2 time points = 10 cells). Variances are also assumed to be homogenous across the cells.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to CowboyBear For This Useful Post:

    cbell723 (07-08-2013)

  7. #5
    Points: 639, Level: 12
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 11
    PrinceOfDarkWater's Avatar
    Location
    Mumbai
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts

    Re: Mixed Model Nested Anova or Two sample test?


    pretreatment treatment are
    Site one
    Site two
    Site three

    Are four different levels (Xs)

    For thickness of the skin layer (y) dependent

    In repeated measure anova the independent variable (X) has categories called level

    Subject to experiment (say) Treatment location site
    Site one Site two Site three pretreatment treatment
    S1 (SLTh)1 (SLTh)1 (SLTh)1 (SLTh)1
    S2 (SLTh)2 (SLTh)2 (SLTh)2 (SLTh)2
    S3 (SLTh)3 (SLTh)3 (SLTh)3 (SLTh)3
    S4 (SLTh)4 (SLTh)4 (SLTh)4 (SLTh)4
    ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
    ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
    ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
    Sn (SLTh)n (SLTh)n (SLTh)n (SLTh)n

    * skin layer thickness (SLTh)


    The repeated measures ANOVA tests for whether there are any differences between related population means. The null hypothesis (H0) states that the means are equal:
    H0: ľ1 = ľ2 = ľ3 = ľ4… = ľk
    where ľ = population mean &
    k = number of related groups.
    The alternative hypothesis (HA) states that the related population means are not equal (at least one mean is different to another mean):
    HA: at least two means are significantly different

    In case if there is significant difference in repeated measure anova then we understand that there is a change through medicine or treatment. After this to know which section showed what change we need to run post-hoc tests that can highlight exactly where these differences occur.

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats