+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: [help]interpretation needed please

  1. #16
    Points: 1,128, Level: 18
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 72

    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please




    Would you reject the hypothesis that the domestic output (x2) has the effect of 3 on y ?And why you using t test but not using normal distribution test?

    this is the question three proper sorry my mistake

    answer this please ... :S adn tell me why we use t test and not using normal distribution it is because that when large sample size we use t test ?? right?

  2. #17
    Points: 1,128, Level: 18
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 72

    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    and should we accept H0 becauase calculated t value of x2 is greater thn tabulated t value right? please...

  3. #18
    Pirate
    Points: 15,159, Level: 79
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 191
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    875
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 332 Times in 297 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    Quote Originally Posted by numerospy View Post
    Would you reject the hypothesis that the domestic output (x2) has the effect of 3 on y ?And why you using t test but not using normal distribution test?
    Ah t and normal distributions are rather similar. The t distribution is used under the assumption of normality of error terms. Using t distribution allows more conservative (broader) confidence intervals. I think using the t distribution is advantageous when the sample is rather small (but the assumptions still hold). When the sample is large enough, using both distributions would provide rather similar results.

    adn tell me why we use t test and not using normal distribution it is because that when large sample size we use t test ?? right?
    No in a large-enough sample, both distributions would be OK (of course if the assumptions are met, in the first place). In smaller samples, the t distribution is better.

    and should we accept H0 becauase calculated t value of x2 is greater thn tabulated t value right? please...
    There is a critical value for the t statistics (the t value) which leads to a P value smaller than 0.05. This value is t = 1.96 for a 95% confidence limit. When the t statistic of the X2 variable is larger than the critical t value (in the case of X2, 3.2356 > 1.96), then the P value would become less than 0.05. When the P values gets less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake
    "victor is a machine! a publication machine!" -Vinux

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to victorxstc For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

  5. #19
    Devorador de queso
    Points: 95,781, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Posting AwardCommunity AwardDiscussion EnderFrequent Poster
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    12,933
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 2,629 Times in 2,245 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    Quote Originally Posted by victorxstc View Post
    Ah t and normal distributions are rather similar. The t distribution is used under the assumption of normality of error terms. Using t distribution allows more conservative (broader) confidence intervals. I think using the t distribution is advantageous when the sample is rather small (but the assumptions still hold).
    You use a t-distribution when you have to estimate the standard deviation from the data itself. So in practice that means pretty much always.
    I don't have emotions and sometimes that makes me very sad.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dason For This Useful Post:

    noetsi (11-18-2013), numerospy (11-20-2013)

  7. #20
    Pirate
    Points: 15,159, Level: 79
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 191
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    875
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 332 Times in 297 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    About your first question, is it good or not: Well you can judge the quality of the regression based on values such as the adjusted r-squared. However, as noetsi pointed out, the question could be asked in a better way: If the regression has a proper accuracy or not (rather than is it good or bad). Anyways, the adjusted r-squared is a key statistics in judging the regression. Based on its value, it seems that your regression is rather accurate (or good). Note that this can be refuted by more sophisticated discussion about the merit of the adjusted r-squared, in the first place. But be sure that this value is an important value that has its implications in judging a regression.
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake
    "victor is a machine! a publication machine!" -Vinux

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to victorxstc For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

  9. #21
    Fortran must die
    Points: 58,790, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    noetsi's Avatar
    Posts
    6,532
    Thanks
    692
    Thanked 915 Times in 874 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    Dason's point is a very good one it took me a long time to find in the literature. Many accounts of t versus z scores deal with distributions or sample size not if you know the SD (something which will almost never be the case in real life). I am not sure how in practice you could ever know it since even past studies could involve populations that changed since the analysis was done.
    "Very few theories have been abandoned because they were found to be invalid on the basis of empirical evidence...." Spanos, 1995

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to noetsi For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

  11. #22
    Pirate
    Points: 15,159, Level: 79
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 191
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    875
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 332 Times in 297 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    About the second question: How you interpret the beta 2 and beta 3 coefficients?

    Well, you can interpret them this way: The variable X2 has a significant positive correlation with the outcome variable (y), when other variables are controlled for. The variable X3 has a negative correlation with the outcome variable, however its effect is not significant.
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake
    "victor is a machine! a publication machine!" -Vinux

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to victorxstc For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

  13. #23
    Pirate
    Points: 15,159, Level: 79
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 191
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    875
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 332 Times in 297 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    The third question asked in your first post in this thread was not clear to me.It is talking about -2 effect on y or +3 effect on y. I think your teacher or source should be first clarified... The thing rejected in such cases is not usually "if something is not -2 or +3". It is usually: "if something is not zero or not". I think there is no sufficient information for answering the third question, or that it is written incorrectly.
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake
    "victor is a machine! a publication machine!" -Vinux

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to victorxstc For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

  15. #24
    Pirate
    Points: 15,159, Level: 79
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 191
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    875
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 332 Times in 297 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    Quote Originally Posted by noetsi View Post
    Dason's point is a very good one it took me a long time to find in the literature. Many accounts of t versus z scores deal with distributions or sample size not if you know the SD (something which will almost never be the case in real life). I am not sure how in practice you could ever know it since even past studies could involve populations that changed since the analysis was done.
    I was talking about the theoretical perspective I knew. I agree with Dason's valuable comment (and yours too) about the practical issue of normal distribution. But still I thought that the t distribution would become normal distribution in larger enough samples (I mean the infinity which might be 30 according to Dason's prof). But anyways, t is the star here.
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake
    "victor is a machine! a publication machine!" -Vinux

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to victorxstc For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

  17. #25
    Points: 1,128, Level: 18
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 72

    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please

    thank you so much i have no words to say thanks to you guys alot thanks again these steps helps me alot and i am now able to solve my assignments by your helps and things you provide here i love you all and thank you so much guys thanks thanks again....

  18. #26
    Pirate
    Points: 15,159, Level: 79
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 191
    victorxstc's Avatar
    Posts
    875
    Thanks
    229
    Thanked 332 Times in 297 Posts

    Re: [help]interpretation needed please


    I am so glad we could be of some help.
    "victor is the reviewer from hell" -Jake
    "victor is a machine! a publication machine!" -Vinux

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to victorxstc For This Useful Post:

    numerospy (11-20-2013)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats