+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: ROC curve induced madness

  1. #1
    Points: 4, Level: 1
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    ROC curve induced madness




    Calling all fellow egg heads

    Iím getting obsessed with ROC curves.

    Why is the horizontal axis of specificity flipped to 1 Ė specificity (false positive rate) rather than just keeping it simple as in (sensitivity versus specificity)?

    Iím guessing itís something to do with history and convention but canít find the answer. Please can someone put me out of my misery!!

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,374, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,998
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: ROC curve induced madness


    I am also pseudo-obsessed with ROC curves. What program do you use?

    I believe the ROC came out of the use of Bayes Theorem in the Pacific during WWII. My guess would be that you want your sensitivity to be as high as possible and your false positive rate as low as possible as well. And that just made better sense to them given their content (signal detention). I would also wonder if they even used the same terms SEN and SPEC? Let us know if you come across the original stats paper introducing it - that would be an interesting read.

    Just for fun, I just flipped the values on the x-axis and it is obviously a mirror image of the ROC curve, however it just did not feel right
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats