+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: not random but justified statistical methods for validating a diet quality index

  1. #1
    Points: 4, Level: 1
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    not random but justified statistical methods for validating a diet quality index




    Has anyone good advice for validating a diet quality index? I have gone through validation studies and the methods used vary a lot. Some of them do not seem reasonable to me and the reasoning for concluding the tool "valid" is often not based on anything. Or so it seems to me. My question is, what is a proper protocol for validating a diet quality index when validating against nutrient intake from diet records?

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: not random but justified statistical methods for validating a diet quality index


    You need to provide more information. Is a "diet quality index" a survey that provides a single number that represents the potential overall dietary quality of food that was taken in? Another big question is what do you compare this to? Typically you validate by comparing to a gold standard to see how good your proxy is at estimating the truth. Also, how is the gold standard quantified?
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats