+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Kaplan Meier Curves + Cox PH

  1. #1
    Points: 20,006, Level: 89
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 344

    Posts
    568
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts

    Kaplan Meier Curves + Cox PH




    Hi all:

    I'm doing a survival analysis on a dataset of about 650 cancer patients. The outcome is time to death. Patients are censored when they are (a) lost to follow up or (b) the study ends, which was Dec 31, 2013. I'm investigating the kaplan meier curves and I notice that for each covariate, the curves intersect. From what I gather, this means that Cox Proportional Hazards may be in appropriate. I've began to investigate some parametric models (the exponential, weibull, log-logistic, log-normal) and so far, none of them seem to fit. Here are some additional details about the dataset and disease.

    -650 patients
    -21 deaths (events) in total
    -Follow up time (years) ranges from a few months (1-2 cases) to 25 years+ (50+ patients)

    What are my options given that the kaplan meier curves intersect in terms of proceeding further? We would like to fit a multivariable model of some sort to adjust for patient risk factors.


    TIA

  2. #2
    Points: 3,730, Level: 38
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 70

    Posts
    155
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts

    Re: Kaplan Meier Curves + Cox PH

    Even though the Kaplan-Meier curves intersect, this doesn't necessarily mean the proportional hazards assumption doesn't hold. UCLA has a pretty clear description of the different methods to use to check the proportional hazards assumption, with example using most of the popular statistical packages: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/example...rtionality.htm

  3. #3
    Points: 20,006, Level: 89
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 344

    Posts
    568
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts

    Re: Kaplan Meier Curves + Cox PH

    Quote Originally Posted by Disvengeance View Post
    Even though the Kaplan-Meier curves intersect, this doesn't necessarily mean the proportional hazards assumption doesn't hold. UCLA has a pretty clear description of the different methods to use to check the proportional hazards assumption, with example using most of the popular statistical packages: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/example...rtionality.htm
    Thanks for the reply + link. We're not going to go ahead with the regression modeling as the event rate is too low. Going to keep it descriptive

  4. #4
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,281, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,990
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Kaplan Meier Curves + Cox PH


    In the past, I thought I interpreted crossing lines as differences in rates if the pull away from each other. Or if they end up intertwining, then equality of rates or indedence.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats