+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: little help, incidence rate with lost to follow-up

  1. #1
    Points: 5, Level: 1
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 45

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    little help, incidence rate with lost to follow-up




    hi there,
    i hope you can help me. I am studying for a test and there is an answer that i cannot solve...
    it asks to calculate the annual incidence rate of a disease, when there are 275 new cases in a year, the number of exposed to the risk factor at the beginning of the year is 2400 and the number of lost to follow up is 960. Can you do that??

    please help me!!!
    thanks

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,334, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,998
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: little help, incidence rate with lost to follow-up


    What textbook are you using for the course. Your actions depend on the procedures you have covered. Theoretically, you would need to make assumptions to move forward. The key assumption would be that there was not a systematic error causing the loss to follow-up (e.g., there was no reason that those exposed or unexposed were more likely to be lost), that loss was random.

    Given you are comfortable saying the previous, a common approach is to treat these individuals as censored and account for them in the denominator. The actuarial life-table approach would be to calculate the incidennce as the number of events divided by the number of subjects in the cohort at baseline minus one half of the losses.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats