+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Structural Equation Modeling: When and why do you use Z-scores instead of Mean.

  1. #1
    Points: 9, Level: 1
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 41

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Structural Equation Modeling: When and why do you use Z-scores instead of Mean.




    Hi.

    Can anyone help me answer the question why some people who do SEM use z-scores as opposed to using mean scores?

    (articles and books are welcomed)

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Phineas Packard
    Points: 16,013, Level: 81
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 337
    Lazar's Avatar
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,159
    Thanks
    198
    Thanked 336 Times in 299 Posts

    Re: Structural Equation Modeling: When and why do you use Z-scores instead of Mean.

    Do we? Can you give a bit more context to the question?

    The only thing I can think you might be getting at is that there is often advice given to put all variables on a similar metric to help facilitate maximum likelihood (gradient descent can struggle when variables are on vastly different metrics)
    "I have done things to data. Dirty things. Things I am not proud of."

  3. #3
    TS Contributor
    Points: 22,448, Level: 93
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 902
    spunky's Avatar
    Location
    vancouver, canada
    Posts
    2,137
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked 538 Times in 432 Posts

    Re: Structural Equation Modeling: When and why do you use Z-scores instead of Mean.

    still, if you transform your variables into z-scores you end up modelling the correlation matrix and not the covariance matrix. and that's a big no-no because the standard errors of the loadings when modelling correlations take larger sample sizes to stabilize.

    we only model correlation matrix (and standardized variables) when we have no way around it (i.e. Muthen's categorical variable methodology where we model the polychoric correlation matrix by virtue of how the latent error variances are defined).
    for all your psychometric needs! https://psychometroscar.wordpress.com/about/

  4. #4
    Points: 9, Level: 1
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 41

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Structural Equation Modeling: When and why do you use Z-scores instead of Mean.

    we were instructed (classroom setting) to use Mean scores, similar to the regression. But I encountered this study that used Zscores. The study made use of different measures for their latent variables and some had 5-point scales and 7-point ones.

  5. #5
    TS Contributor
    Points: 22,448, Level: 93
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 902
    spunky's Avatar
    Location
    vancouver, canada
    Posts
    2,137
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked 538 Times in 432 Posts

    Re: Structural Equation Modeling: When and why do you use Z-scores instead of Mean.


    Quote Originally Posted by dmorga View Post
    we were instructed (classroom setting) to use Mean scores, similar to the regression. But I encountered this study that used Zscores. The study made use of different measures for their latent variables and some had 5-point scales and 7-point ones.
    care to share what "this study" is? is it a published article we could have access to? if these people did things right, they fitted their SEM model using a method specifically designed for (ordered) categorical data and there is a (very) tangential relationship between z-scores and SEM through the probit link function.
    for all your psychometric needs! https://psychometroscar.wordpress.com/about/

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats