+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: What does a positive t-statistic mean?

  1. #1
    Points: 3,208, Level: 35
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 142

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    What does a positive t-statistic mean?




    I just worked out a t-statistic for a hypothesis and I got 2.5. When I did the same hypothesis test with random values I ended up with 0.94. Is that a significant difference, since it's only about 1.5 difference? I'm not sure what a 2.5 t-statistic actually means (in words) so I can't comment on how they compare to one another.... can anyone help?
    Also, what would a negative t-statistic imply?

  2. #2
    Points: 3,264, Level: 35
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 86

    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hi land144,
    The t-test uses something called the t-distribution to work out if sample differences are significant. (see http://www.statistics4u.com/fundstat...student_t.html)

    It is basically a probability density function. The higher the absolute value of the t-statistic, the lower the probability - that is the lower the probability that the difference is random, i.e more probable that the difference observed is due to a systematic influence (i.e. experimental intervention). The actual distribution depends on the degrees of freedom, or in this case the number of observations-1. Using the criteria of alpha=0.05, one can work out what the critical t-value should be for the degrees of freedom.

    Different statistical tests use different probablity functions, e.g. ANOVA uses the F distribution.

    Assuming infinite degrees of freedom: Using random data to get a t-value of 0.94 is expected, as it would not be signficant - after all, it was randomly selected. Getting a t-value of 2.5 would be signficant, as alpha would be <0.05. Have a look at this table http://www.socr.ucla.edu/Applets.dir/T-table.html and see what you get with the df in your case.

    You can't have a negative t-statistic because you can't have a 'negative probability' or something happening or not happening.

    Hope this helps
    William

  3. #3
    Points: 6,595, Level: 53
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 155

    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by williaml View Post
    Hi land144,
    The t-test uses something called the t-distribution to work out if sample differences are significant. (see http://www.statistics4u.com/fundstat...student_t.html)

    It is basically a probability density function. The higher the absolute value of the t-statistic, the lower the probability - that is the lower the probability that the difference is random, i.e more probable that the difference observed is due to a systematic influence (i.e. experimental intervention). The actual distribution depends on the degrees of freedom, or in this case the number of observations-1. Using the criteria of alpha=0.05, one can work out what the critical t-value should be for the degrees of freedom.

    Different statistical tests use different probablity functions, e.g. ANOVA uses the F distribution.

    Assuming infinite degrees of freedom: Using random data to get a t-value of 0.94 is expected, as it would not be signficant - after all, it was randomly selected. Getting a t-value of 2.5 would be signficant, as alpha would be <0.05. Have a look at this table http://www.socr.ucla.edu/Applets.dir/T-table.html and see what you get with the df in your case.

    You can't have a negative t-statistic because you can't have a 'negative probability' or something happening or not happening.

    Hope this helps
    William
    Just some tedious corrections:

    1) You do not get the probability of the difference being random. And you do not get the probability of a certain t-value (you may not mean these things but you seem to invite that interpretation). The p-value just tells you the probability of observing a difference as extreme as the observed one or more extreme (which you did not, but which might have happened, unobserved data) if we assume that the null is true. That&#180;s just what it is, and alpha controls Type I error rates.

    2) t can be negative (depending on which mean is subtracted from which), but p cannot of course.

    That&#180;s all

+ Reply to Thread

           




Similar Threads

  1. explain why... negative becomes positive
    By 98107 in forum Statistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-26-2010, 04:09 AM
  2. false positive
    By SadieKhan in forum Probability
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-21-2010, 03:53 AM
  3. Positive predictive value
    By somba in forum Biostatistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 05:43 AM
  4. positive definite
    By leo nidas in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-13-2010, 08:36 PM
  5. positive definiteness???
    By Liz77 in forum Statistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 08:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats