+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Risk Management

  1. #1
    Points: 656, Level: 13
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 44

    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Risk Management




    There is 3% coral coverage in a sea area of l=200m b=5m. The size(diameter) of each coral is 50 cm. If we throw a block of 1m2 in the area. How many coral will get hit by the block?(probability

    I dont even know where to start.
    Even a small hint will be really appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Last edited by Mr Good News; 04-10-2015 at 03:04 AM.

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,334, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,998
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: Risk Management

    What is l=200m b=5m. Length? B?
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #3
    Points: 1,470, Level: 21
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 30

    Posts
    50
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Risk Management


    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Good News View Post
    There is 3% coral coverage in a sea area of l=200m b=5m. The size(diameter) of each coral is 50 cm. If we throw a block of 1m2 in the area. How many coral will get hit by the block?(probability

    I dont even know where to start.
    Even a small hint will be really appreciated.
    Thanks!
    I don't have the knowledge required to solve this problem, but I had some fun trying
    to establish a footing. To rough out a start, it was simpler to use squares rather than
    circles for both coral and block shapes. From the data, it's straightforward to find
    the number of corals (120). I wanted to see what the situation looked like for a
    uniform distribution of corals, and I chose a grid of equilateral triangles spread over
    the sea area. Thus all 120 corals were equidistant (4.3 meters) from each other.
    From the geometry, it's clear that the probability of a "hit" on a coral is not high.
    I was able to deduce a probability of about 0.18

    With random distributions (placements) of corals, clustering also means more
    empty space, so it's not clear whether or not probabilities of hits will increase
    or decrease compared to the uniform case . In the extreme case of clustering
    where all 120 corals are bunched together, there is then mostly empty sea and
    a very low probability of hits. I suspect that the uniform distribution case is the
    case of maximum probability of hits. If so, I think that's the end of it. The
    answer to the question then is that probabilities vary from a high of about
    0.18 downward.

    Art

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats