+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: beating the rules at discrete sampling

  1. #1
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,227, Level: 72
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,470
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 332 Times in 312 Posts

    beating the rules at discrete sampling




    hi,
    I am looking at the question of how to sample rare occurances, like a rare defect in a manufacturing line. If I use the standard sample size formula the sample size goes into hundreds, which is unreasonable due to the long waiting times.

    My idea s to measure the time intervals between occurences.mThis being continous I can get a much smaller sample size to get the average waiting time between occurences. Knowing the production rate I can even estimate the percentage occurences - thus beating the odds.

    Does this make sense?

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,303, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,993
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: beating the rules at discrete sampling

    No, I don't get it. You want to get a random sample of just rare events or a random sample of all observations with a set number of the rare events?


    I also did not under stand your time approach, but would like to understand it!
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #3
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,227, Level: 72
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,470
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 332 Times in 312 Posts

    Re: beating the rules at discrete sampling

    imagine we have a line producing cars.Once in a while a csr comes off the line with a serious defect. I can measure the percentage defective cars and for a given precision I can get a sample size. but because the percentage is small I will need a hogh accuracy and this will lead to a large sample. If I nee 3000 samples and a defect happens once a day . I would need about 10 years to get the sample.

    The alternative is to measure the waiting time between defects, I do not need a such a high accuracy and it is a continuous variable - I might get a sample size of about a hundred say - so I can be done in 4 month.

    regards

  4. #4
    Devorador de queso
    Points: 95,705, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Posting AwardCommunity AwardDiscussion EnderFrequent Poster
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    12,931
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 2,629 Times in 2,245 Posts

    Re: beating the rules at discrete sampling

    What is it that you're trying to measure? The defect rate?
    I don't have emotions and sometimes that makes me very sad.

  5. #5
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,227, Level: 72
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,470
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 332 Times in 312 Posts

    Re: beating the rules at discrete sampling


    Yes, it would be an assesment of the present situation like " how bad are we really"?

    regards

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats