+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: PAF through formula or through Conditional Logistic Regression

  1. #1
    Points: 11, Level: 1
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 39

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    PAF through formula or through Conditional Logistic Regression




    Hi all,

    In a large registry dataset of psychiatric patients, if one wants to find the excess risk of schizophrenia patients developing depression, what would be the best method to apply:

    1) Use the relevant formula to calculate PAF (Population Attributable Fraction).

    Formula can be found here: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global...etrics_paf/en/

    OR 2) perform a conditional logistic regression (using the clogit command in stata) to obtain the excess odds of schizophrenia patients developing depression.

    What is the key difference between the two (if any)?

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 6,786, Level: 54
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 164

    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    524
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 112 Times in 100 Posts

    Re: PAF through formula or through Conditional Logistic Regression

    The PAF is a simple statistic and probably easier to interpret than the logit. But I would say that the logit model can accomplish a lot more than the PAF and I would go for that 9 times out of ten.

  3. #3
    Points: 11, Level: 1
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 39

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: PAF through formula or through Conditional Logistic Regression


    Hi, thanks for your response. But, what is the key difference between the two approaches?

    Thanks

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats