+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Multinomial Logistic Regression - Interaction Effect

  1. #1

    Multinomial Logistic Regression - Interaction Effect




    Hello there,

    I would appreciate it very much if someone could help.

    In my study, participants saw a picture of a man or woman either with or without a cigarette. So I have a 2(Male, Female) x 2(smoker, non-smoker) experimental design.

    The question is whether participants would choose to (1) Date, (2)Not Date or (3)Become Friends (with the person on the picture).

    I have put Gender and Smoking Status into the Co-Variate Box in SPSS and put the DV into the DV-Box with (2)Not Date as a reference category.

    I used a cutomized model, that is, I put Gender, Smoking Status and Gender*Smoking Status into the model by using the forced-entry method.

    After analyzing the data I found that the likelihood ratio test of the overall model was nearly significant (p=0.070). However, the analysis revealed that the likelihood ratio test of Gender*Smoking Status was significant, x2(2) = 4.32, p = 0.02.

    Can I still interpret this interaction effect even if the overall model is not significant?


    And suppose, the overall model was significant and I wanted to do follow-ups, how would I be able to compare, say, the smoking woman to the non-smoking woman with regard to the 3 outcomes?

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,303, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,993
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Multinomial Logistic Regression - Interaction Effect

    Add some more detail about this:


    "After analyzing the data I found that the likelihood ratio test of the overall model was nearly significant (p=0.070). However, the analysis revealed that the likelihood ratio test of Gender*Smoking Status was significant, x2(2) = 4.32, p = 0.02. "


    LR test = test of empty model versus saturated model?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to hlsmith For This Useful Post:

    lost_in_statistics (09-01-2015)

  4. #3
    Points: 34, Level: 1
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 16

    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Multinomial Logistic Regression - Interaction Effect


    Quote Originally Posted by hlsmith View Post
    Add some more detail about this:


    "After analyzing the data I found that the likelihood ratio test of the overall model was nearly significant (p=0.070). However, the analysis revealed that the likelihood ratio test of Gender*Smoking Status was significant, x2(2) = 4.32, p = 0.02. "


    LR test = test of empty model versus saturated model?
    Thanks for your prompt reply! :-)

    But does the overall model not need to be significant in order to continue with interpreting the interaction effect?

    As for the follow-ups, would it not be sensible to split the data and then just look at each level of gender seperately, so as to look at: smoking woman vs. non-smoking woman and smoking man vs. non-smoking man?

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats