+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Logistic Regression

  1. #1
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Logistic Regression




    I am looking at a medical outcome (binary) and known risk factors. There are 10 established risk factors that I will test in my sample of 300 patients.


    However, all of the patients have one of the predictors (X1), so I know interpreting the intercept of the empty model provides the probability of this predictor (X1), 27% have outcome of interest.


    Now when I examine the other 9 known predictors, 2 are significant in my sample (X2, X3). So I know patients can have between 1-3 significant predictors. Is there any other way I can present the intercept besides the probability of the outcome or do I always just report my odds ratios for the other two significant predictors as the odds of Y are 10 times greater for X1 patients when they have X2 and you control for X3? And vice versa.


    Also, it seems like I would never know if there was an interaction between X1 and any of the other variable because I do not have data for the reference group for X1. I feel I can move forward, but wanted to see if anybody has any insights or suggestions!
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  2. #2
    Devorador de queso
    Points: 95,540, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Posting AwardCommunity AwardDiscussion EnderFrequent Poster
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    12,930
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 2,629 Times in 2,245 Posts

    Re: Logistic Regression

    Are you saying X1 is constant? There is no variation in the values in X1? It doesn't make sense to include it in the model.
    I don't have emotions and sometimes that makes me very sad.

  3. #3
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Logistic Regression

    Correct, I don't include it in the model. I called it X1 to give it a name, I thought the 1-3 risk factors line could be misleading as well.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  4. #4
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Logistic Regression

    For disclosure, there is another variable we will call X4, which no patients have.


    So: percentage of patients with it...

    X1 (not in model): 100%
    X2: 4%
    X3: 34%
    X4: 0%


    And some obvious combinations, so patient has X1-3, etc.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  5. #5
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Logistic Regression


    I have not written this, but all risk factors are binary, so I am just looking at:


    In X1=1 and X4 = 0 patients, when controlling for X3, patients with X2=1 have 10 times greater odds of Y=1 than patients with X2=0.


    This initially looks confusing, but is my scenario, with X1 and X4 not in the model
    .
    Last edited by hlsmith; 12-18-2015 at 10:05 AM. Reason: rephrased
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats