+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Chi Square and Regression

  1. #1
    Points: 5, Level: 1
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 45

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Chi Square and Regression




    Hi all,

    First time post so please go easy on me

    I have a bunch of categorical variables that I am thinking of using as predictor variables in a logit regression. I have conducted some chi-square tests between these variables and my outcome variable, some of which have come back as insignificant. Should I be advised to drop these variables from my regression or should is there any rationale to these variables in?

    Many thanks for any input you can provide!

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,253, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,989
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Chi Square and Regression

    There are many argument to drop or keep. Perhaps by insignificant they were 0.06, underpowered, but of interest in analyses (a known predictor). In such a scenario, I would argue that keeping them may be a feasible option.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #3
    Points: 3,006, Level: 33
    Level completed: 71%, Points required for next Level: 44

    Posts
    177
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts

    Re: Chi Square and Regression

    that really depends, and to be honest, you do not know the multi-variable structure of the model yet either.

    i.e. males might be insignificant but male teacher (the interaction between those two binary variables) is significant.

    you just dont know until you look at the data.


    From another perspective, you should really let theory guide you somewhat in what you include in your model. I am a strong proponent of grounding my statistical work in the literature, especially when it comes to model construction. And if you are sending this out to a journal, they are most certainly going to ask why you did not control for such and such variable.

    In summation, including a non-significant factor in a theoretical model is ok because it controls for that variable. Easier to show causation (not prove, but at least provide more evidence).

  4. #4
    Fortran must die
    Points: 58,790, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    noetsi's Avatar
    Posts
    6,532
    Thanks
    692
    Thanked 915 Times in 874 Posts

    Re: Chi Square and Regression


    Although I know this is commonly not done in practice, you really are supposed to base what variables go in the model on theory not such tests anyhow And if theory supports a variable leaving it in the model if the p value is close to say .05 may make sense ( the use of .05 rather than .06 is essentially an artificial convention). Moreover, univariate models, which it looks like what you ran, commonly does not predict multivariate relationships anyhow.

    If you have some theory or even hunch to support using the variables I would not drop them simply because you ran a chi square test on individual predictors. In honesty I don't think you gain anything from running univariate tests period.
    "Very few theories have been abandoned because they were found to be invalid on the basis of empirical evidence...." Spanos, 1995

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats