+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

  1. #1
    Points: 57, Level: 1
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 43

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?




    Hi everyone,

    I'd like to know if I should consider a correction for attenuation in a multiple regression I'd like to run on my data.

    Here's why:

    Based on one of the predictors (identity management), people are allocated into 4 different groups. This variable has 16 items (4 items for each identity management group). The cronbach-alpha value for one of the groups is below 0.5.

    My questions are:

    - Should I do away with the group altogether because the cronbach-alpha is low (0.4)? i.e. I only consider the 3 other groups? Would this be correct?

    - I've ready that I can run a correction for attenuation in the multiple regression analysis. Is this necessary? And is there any way I can run it on SPSS? Or would I have to run it on SPSS Macro/R/another program?

    Thank you in advance!

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 17,779, Level: 84
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 71
    Karabiner's Avatar
    Location
    FC Schalke 04, Germany
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 640 Times in 602 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

    Based on one of the predictors (identity management), people are allocated into 4 different groups. This variable has 16 items (4 items for each identity management group).
    Not completely clear what you are doing there.
    You have a variable measured with 16 items, and
    after allocation into groups (how was this done?
    and how large is your sample size, BTW?) you only
    use 4 items in each respective group?


    The cronbach-alpha value for one of the groups is below 0.5.
    See above - what exactely does have a Cronbachs Alpha < 0.5?

    - Should I do away with the group altogether because the cronbach-alpha is low (0.4)? i.e. I only consider the 3 other groups? Would this be correct?
    You did not describe the study (topic, research question etc.)
    and the technical details are not clear (see above), so this
    is not easy to answer.

    - I've ready that I can run a correction for attenuation in the multiple regression analysis. Is this necessary?
    You did not describe what you will to regress on what, and
    what for. Or, what you want to achieve by such a correction.
    Is is a common practice in your field?

    With Kind regards

    K.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Karabiner For This Useful Post:

    majortom88 (04-12-2016)

  4. #3
    Points: 57, Level: 1
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 43

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

    Hi K.,

    Thanks for your comments

    You have a variable measured with 16 items, and after allocation into groups (how was this done? and how large is your sample size, BTW?) you only use 4 items in each respective group?
    My sample size is about 180. After cleaning the data, I have about 160. Allocation in group was based on calculating the mean score for each subdimension. Participants were asked to indicate the frequency of their behaviour with regards to the item (never, occasionally, frequently, always). I am using this scale to determine which groups the participants can be allocated to.

    A study, which uses this scale says this: "Item ratings are averaged and higher scores indicate greater levels of the corresponding behaviors."

    Based on the data, all participants have been allocated to 3 groups. 1 of the groups remains empty, as no one has indicated that they have shown behaviour manifested in the items.

    You did not describe the study (topic, research question etc.) and the technical details are not clear (see above), so this is not easy to answer.
    The topic is on authenticity at the workplace amongst LGBT employees. The research question is about how self-rated authenticity affects the career-relevant variables (work engagement, commitment, job satisfaction, etc.) amongst LGBT employees, depending how they deal with their identity at the workplace - in other words, if they are "out" or "in the closet".

    Outcome variables:
    -career-relevant variables

    Predictors:
    -identity disclosure
    -self-rated authenticity (proposed moderator)

    You did not describe what you will to regress on what, and what for. Or, what you want to achieve by such a correction. Is is a common practice in your field
    I plan to regress identity disclosure and authenticity on career-relevant variables. The cronbach-alpha for one of the sub dimensions in the identity disclosure scale is below 0.5.

    So, given that only 2 groups are filled (group 1 is empty & the scale for group 3 has a low cronbach-alpha score), I wanted to know if I should/could conduct a correction to run an analysis, if I have 3 groups.

    I won't say it's common practice.

    Thanks for your feedback on this!

  5. #4
    TS Contributor
    Points: 17,779, Level: 84
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 71
    Karabiner's Avatar
    Location
    FC Schalke 04, Germany
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 640 Times in 602 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

    I still have some problems to understand what you are doing.
    You want to perform 4 separate analyses, one for each group?
    And within each analysis, you will use only one specific 4-item
    subscale as predictor? Or all four 4-item-subscales? In any case,
    I don't understand why the grouping is done at all.
    If a group is constructed by picking participants who have high
    values the items of one of the scales, then variance within
    the group will be low for these items, and hence correlations
    between items will decrease. Don't know how correction for
    attenuation could help here.


    With kind regards

    K.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Karabiner For This Useful Post:

    majortom88 (04-19-2016)

  7. #5
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,396, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,001
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

    What is attenuation? Can you provide a link to the concept.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  8. #6
    TS Contributor
    Points: 14,811, Level: 78
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,171
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 405 Times in 363 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by hlsmith View Post
    What is attenuation? Can you provide a link to the concept.
    I believe that this is what the OP means https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_dilution

    Correction for attenuation is done on the correlation, not the regression. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correc...or_attenuation

    If you have noise in your IVs, you would use an Errors-in-variables approach. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Errors...riables_models and Deming regression https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deming_regression

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Miner For This Useful Post:

    hlsmith (04-13-2016), Karabiner (04-14-2016)

  10. #7
    TS Contributor
    Points: 17,779, Level: 84
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 71
    Karabiner's Avatar
    Location
    FC Schalke 04, Germany
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 640 Times in 602 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?

    Correction for attenuation is done on the correlation, not the regression.
    Seemingly, this statement answers the OP's question.

    Admittedly, I have only seen it with correlation before, not with regression,
    but I assumed that the OP had a reference for using a correction with regression.

    With kind regards

    K.

  11. #8
    Points: 4, Level: 1
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 46

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Is correction for attenuation in my regression analysis necessary?


    Is it possible to 'correct for attenuation' in SPSS, and, if so, how do I do it?

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats