+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Which analysis to use?

  1. #1
    Points: 337, Level: 6
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 13

    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Which analysis to use?




    Hi! I have a design with two categorical iv and one continuous iv with a continuous dv. I wanted to see if there was a main effect or interaction from the categorical ivs, so I used the syntax:

    glm DV by IV1 IV2.

    There were no significant interactions or main effects. I wanted to then add in the third and continuous iv, so I ran:

    glm DV by IV1 IV2 with IV3/
    design=IV1 IV2 IV3 IV1*IV3 IV2*IV3 IV1*IV2*IV3.

    I'm confused if I did something wrong because the F and p values for IV1 and IV2 are different from the earlier output. Why is this and which one would I report?

    Thanks so much!

  2. #2
    Points: 3,506, Level: 37
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 144

    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts

    Re: Which analysis to use?


    Not sure what package you are using so I can't judge the syntax. But when you add one or more independent variables (to be adjusted for in the model) it is entirely possible that all the p-values without them would change. Suppose IV1 level 1 had high values of IV3, whereas IV1 level 2 had mostly low values of IV3. The model would adjust for that and could greatly reduce the significance of IV1 (assuming IV3 is associated with DV). This would be a correction for confounding by IV3, or it could be an overcorrection of some sort (say, IV1 changes values of IV3 in a causal way). In either case, p-values for IV1 could change.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to EdGr For This Useful Post:

    vl11 (09-30-2016)

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats