+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Model vs. test

  1. #1
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,227, Level: 72
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,470
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 332 Times in 312 Posts

    Model vs. test




    Hi,
    we just had an interesting discussion about the chi-squared test, that could be generalized. I think the core of the discussion was whether one should prefer a simple statistical test or a statistical model - e.g. a chi-squared test vs. a logistic regression.

    Given that in practice one is most often also interested in questions that the model can answer but the test can not, I would suggest that except for rare, clear-cut cases, building a model is preferable to simply running a test.

    What do you think?

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Model vs. test


    Agreed. It took me a little while before I got on board with this earlier in my career, but now that I know logistic reg well, I try to stay in that boat most of the time.


    Benefits: can easily add options to address sparse data, get odds ratios, get bootstraps or other CIs, get accuracy metrics, and most importantly control for other variables and run contrasts or estimates.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to hlsmith For This Useful Post:

    rogojel (07-07-2016)

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats