+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005

  1. #1
    Points: 20, Level: 1
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 30

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005




    I was looking into a research paper, and this F value was provided when using a regression model. I do not understand, what is the need to discuss F value in a paper? It is just an intermediary value. Or, does it really help in understanding some fact other than observed from correlation/regression results.

  2. #2
    Devorador de queso
    Points: 95,889, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Posting AwardCommunity AwardDiscussion EnderFrequent Poster
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    12,937
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 2,630 Times in 2,246 Posts

    Re: F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005

    From an applied perspective it's not really important. I typically don't even process the test statistics mentally when they are presented like that. With that said think presenting them is important. It makes the analysis at least a touch more transparent. If I somehow got access to the data one could check that the test statistics presented match what you could get from analyzing the data yourself. Sometimes it also helps give an idea about the relative size of the p value and in doing so can help give an indication if something smells fishy.
    I don't have emotions and sometimes that makes me very sad.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Dason For This Useful Post:

    leodzb (08-06-2016)

  4. #3
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,396, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,001
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005

    I duplicate Dason's statements and say that some more social sciences have a greater tradition of reporting such measures. Which I think is just an artifact.


    Some authors may feel that they are presenting more results that look technical. Though, what this showed me was hey you have quiet a few predicts given your sample size. I have no idea the context around this model, but it could be overfitted.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to hlsmith For This Useful Post:

    leodzb (08-06-2016)

  6. #4
    TS Contributor
    Points: 18,889, Level: 87
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 461
    CowboyBear's Avatar
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,062
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked 427 Times in 328 Posts

    Re: F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005

    Reporting F statistics that way is dictated by APA style. But I think it can be useful to report them for a couple of reasons:
    1) If you haven't reported the actual means/effect sizes, the F statistic can be more useful as a way to back-calculate the effect size than the p value (since the p value will often be a very small number that may not reported precisely, e.g. "p < .001")
    2) It allows readers and reviewers to check at least a small part of your calculation process. People report p values that don't line up with the reported intermediary test statistics a surprisingly large proportion of the time (anecdotally)
    Matt aka CB | twitter.com/matthewmatix

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to CowboyBear For This Useful Post:

    leodzb (08-06-2016)

  8. #5
    Super Moderator
    Points: 13,151, Level: 74
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Dragan's Avatar
    Location
    Illinois, US
    Posts
    2,014
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 223 Times in 192 Posts

    Re: F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005

    F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005

    It suggests to me - at face value - that the sample size is too small (N=114) with 18 predictors for an OLS regression model.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Dragan For This Useful Post:

    leodzb (08-06-2016)

  10. #6
    Points: 20, Level: 1
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 30

    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: F (18, 95) = 6.009, p < 0.0005


    Thanks to all of you! I can see there can be a number of reasons. Best!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats