+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Change over time

  1. #1
    Points: 5, Level: 1
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 45

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Change over time




    Hi all,

    I am looking at patient activity for a disease and have patient numbers for 5 years (2009-2013). I have numbers for 4 different types:

    Alcohol-induced unique patients 153, 151 171 176 162
    Alcohol induced discharges 215, 202, 226, 236, 222
    Non-alcohol induced unique patients 394, 424, 459, 429, 460
    Non-alcohol induced discharges 538, 548, 583, 552, 777

    I've been advised to just state the % difference between 2009 and 2013, but I don't think this is the correct way to look at the data. Is there any way, with these limited data, to say whether or not there is a trend (increase) over time? I don't believe there is... but it would be nice to be able to say definitively.

    I am currently using SPSS.

    Many thanks for your time,
    Sinead

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,374, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,998
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: Change over time

    Well if you have proportions you are examining over time you may be able to use the armitage and Cochrane trend test (sp?).


    I couldn't tell if you had more than two groups, but if you do there is a different test that I forget the name of, named after a person with a j-name, jaensky or something.


    Also, it may be possible to use logistic regression with year as a continuous prediction variable, so 1,2,3,4 and see if the its coefficient is significant.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #3
    Points: 228, Level: 4
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 22

    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

    Re: Change over time


    One simple way to go about it would be to create a 4x5 table and conduct a Pearson's chi-square test. The null hypothesis would be that the proportions of each type are the same over all 5 years. A rejection of the null would not inform you of whether there's an increasing or decreasing trend, but you can probably tell just by eyeballing it.

    Just as a word of caution, though, since you have rather large sample sizes, even minute differences may appear as significant. So judgement should be exercised in interpreting whether the percentage change over the years really "matter" or not.
    Last edited by ab-stats; 08-26-2016 at 07:08 PM.
    http://ab-stats.com

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats