+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: please help me make sense of my multilevel linear regression [R]

  1. #1
    Points: 6,387, Level: 52
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 163
    Junes's Avatar
    Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts

    please help me make sense of my multilevel linear regression [R]

    Hi everyone,

    I'm trying to wrap my head around multilevel (or mixed-effect) models, but not quite succeeding.

    I have the following data from a pilot study: 221 ratings (mean of several items on 1-5 Likert scale) for trustworthiness from 13 people on 17 internet profiles (fully crossed). I'm trying to model the following:

    - profile as a random intercept (these are my items)
    - rater as a random intercept (these are my subjects)
    - log(word_count) as my IV that has a random slope for each rater (each person values "wordiness" differently)

    There is no measurement error for word_count (it is simply calculated on the basis of the profile text).

    So, I have the following in R (lme4):

    model <- lmer(trust ~ log(word_count) + (1+log(word_count)|rater) + (1|profile), data=dt)
    Did I do this correctly? What I get is the following output:

    Random effects:
     Groups   Name          Variance  Std.Dev. Corr
     profile  (Intercept)    0.1298242 0.36031      
     rater   (Intercept)     0.0009746 0.03122      
              log(word_count) 0.0033183 0.05760  1.00
     Residual                 0.1388396 0.37261      
    Number of obs: 221, groups:  profile, 17; rater, 13
    Fixed effects:
                    Estimate Std. Error t value
    (Intercept)       2.7062     0.4800   5.637
    log(word_count)   0.1697     0.1016   1.670
    Correlation of Fixed Effects:
    lg(wrd_cnt) -0.967
    What I don't understand: why there is a correlation of 1 between the intercepts of rater and the slope of log(word_count)? Does it have something to do with the fact that I have a fully crossed design?

    As I wrote in a previous thread, this a pilot study. Even though I know a multilevel approach is better, there are a number of reasons to simply aggregate the data to profile level (simplicity, methods more familiar in field, being able to easily calculate an R^2 and p, etc.). With the random effect of rater being the size that it is, would you say it makes sense to simply aggregate? (Though word count is expected to be one of the larger effects).
    Last edited by Junes; 11-07-2016 at 04:27 PM.

+ Reply to Thread


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Advertise on Talk Stats