+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Dealing with temporal autocorrelation

  1. #1
    Points: 2,462, Level: 30
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 138

    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 48 Times in 43 Posts

    Dealing with temporal autocorrelation




    Hi,

    assume we have a measured value for each year from 1990-210, and we want to estimate a linear trend. Now there is a problem of autocorrelation, i.e., the measured values do not scatter randomly around the fittet line but rather resemble a "smooth function" wriggeling around the linear fit (i.e. sinus-like). Finally, assume that I cannot use the standard AR- or MA-approach to deal with this, since it is not provided by the software I use. But I could use mixed modelling or additive modelling instead. As far as I see, I have two possibilities to deal with this violation of idependence, and I am not sure which one is better:

    (1) Beside the linear predictor ''year'' I additionally introduce ''year'' as a random intercept factor variable. Would this solve the problem? Since the mean value of the random term is zero it would not bias the linear trend estimate. But is the temporal autorrelation appropriately covered by such a term?

    (2) Beside the linear predictor ''year'' I additionally introduce ''year'' as an cyclic smoothing term. Cyclic means here that both ends of the smoother would match up to second derivatives. This would prevent this variable from interfering with the linear trend estimate.

    Which of these two possibilities (if at all) is the better choice? Thanks in advance
    Last edited by mmercker; 01-10-2017 at 04:41 AM.

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 11,424, Level: 70
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 226
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,416
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked 325 Times in 305 Posts

    Re: Dealing with temporal autocorrelation

    hi,
    I have no great experience with time series but I would guess that much will depend on the precise structure of your series. E.g is the autocorrelation for a lag of one or is it something more complex? If only short term effects (small lags , essentially 1 ) are important you could model the differences instead of the values themselves.
    regards

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to rogojel For This Useful Post:

    mmercker (01-11-2017)

  4. #3
    Fortran must die
    Points: 52,364, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    noetsi's Avatar
    Posts
    6,479
    Thanks
    681
    Thanked 912 Times in 871 Posts

    Re: Dealing with temporal autocorrelation


    Personally I would get better software or learn R

    There are well accepted ways of addressing autocorrelation and they are not the ones you suggested [most involve specifying lags of Y; MA are not generally addressed for multivariate time series in part I think because most think those are unlikely in the social sciences].
    "Very few theories have been abandoned because they were found to be invalid on the basis of empirical evidence...." Spanos, 1995

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to noetsi For This Useful Post:

    mmercker (01-11-2017)

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats