+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: paired or unpaired?

  1. #1
    Points: 473, Level: 9
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 27

    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    paired or unpaired?




    Hi,

    Need some advice, if I'm comparing species abundance in the same location across two different seasons is this paired or non-paired for Mann-Whitney-U?

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Points: 2,462, Level: 30
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 138

    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 48 Times in 43 Posts

    Re: paired or unpaired?

    So you have different measurements of species numbers at this location in each season, I guess? In this case you should better use a Poisson-regression model (since you have count data) with the categorical predictor "season" and the species number as the outcome. But do'nt you have the problem that the species abundance changes continuously with the time of year rather than changing suddenly with the season? In this case your data could show temporal autocorrelation, which has to be considered within the regression model.
    Last edited by mmercker; 01-14-2017 at 10:29 AM.

  3. #3
    Points: 473, Level: 9
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 27

    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: paired or unpaired?

    I basically have 30 locations and for each location I have an abundance measure for 1 dry season and 1 rainy season. I thought Mann-Whitney-U was okay for this?

  4. #4
    Super Moderator
    Points: 13,151, Level: 74
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Dragan's Avatar
    Location
    Illinois, US
    Posts
    2,014
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 223 Times in 192 Posts

    Re: paired or unpaired?

    Quote Originally Posted by whyisstatssohard View Post
    I basically have 30 locations and for each location I have an abundance measure for 1 dry season and 1 rainy season. I thought Mann-Whitney-U was okay for this?
    What is the correlation between the 30 dry season and 30 rainy season data points?

  5. #5
    Points: 473, Level: 9
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 27

    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: paired or unpaired?

    p=0.0132 when paired=TRUE, but when paired=FALSE p=0.09667

    So I need to decide whether it's paired or not because thats a big difference! I assumed paired as its the same locations being compared but friends have argued not paired as it will be different individual animals being recorded and the season is differen't. Seems like it should be so simple but I can't get my head around it!!

  6. #6
    Points: 1,974, Level: 26
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 26

    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    227
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 48 Times in 47 Posts

    Re: paired or unpaired?

    It looks like paired data to me, assuming that some sites are naturally more abundant than others. Find the site differences and see if the differences look normal. If the differences are more or less normal then I would use the paired t test. otherwise the Wilcoxon test.

  7. #7
    Points: 473, Level: 9
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 27

    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: paired or unpaired?


    Fab, it's not normally distributed so i'll do a paired wilcoxon

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats