+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Adjustment for correlated data in meta-anlaysis

  1. #1
    Points: 5, Level: 1
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 45

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Adjustment for correlated data in meta-anlaysis




    Hi,
    I'm completing a systematic review and performing meta-anlaysis forest plots. The research question related to the finding of risk factors for a complication of diabetes. There are therefore many different risk factors and often there are only three papers with similar methods(observational, longitudinal) and effect measure e.g. odds ratio or risk ratio. There are several occasions where the population study, being longitudinal has reported findings several years apart, this raises the problem of similar study design for a similare risk factor, however there is correlated or clustered data- based on a simlar population sample.
    How can I adjust the meta-analysis to accommodate correlated population data. Should the meta-analysis not be performed at all?

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Adjustment for correlated data in meta-anlaysis

    Hmm, good question. So is it the exact some study design, but for different time periods?


    P.S., As you mentioned, meta-analyses based on observational data are difficult.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #3
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,289, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,992
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 1,185 Times in 1,146 Posts

    Re: Adjustment for correlated data in meta-anlaysis


    Well, I was just thinking about your question. I have not done anything analyses with the same issues. The MA process with control for heterogeneity between studies, though you have the exact opposite, though only one cluster, so most studies aren't in a cluster. MAYBE, this is just a maybe, an addition dummy term can be added to the model which is 1 if they are in that cluster and 0 if not. You may also be able to fiddle around with sensitivity analysis of leaving it out and including it to see how sensitive results are.


    I would image you may be able to do some literature review and see how others address this concern in their MAs. Since this has to come up in MAs.


    Let us know what you find out or do, since I would be interested to know!
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats