+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Sign differences in coefficients arising from using ordinal vs continuous data

  1. #1
    Points: 6, Level: 1
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 44

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Smile Sign differences in coefficients arising from using ordinal vs continuous data




    I run a simple OLS regression: y=a +bx+.....+e,

    I obtain an estimate of b<0.

    Prior researchers running the a similar regression obtain an estimate of b>0: I'm trying to reconcile this difference.

    The only methodological difference driving our results is the following:

    In my study, both y and x are continous variables.

    The prior researcher uses ranked data: y ={1,2,3,4,5} and x={1st,2nd,..... nth}.

    My question is: can the difference in methodology explain the difference in estimates for b (sign change)? If so, how?

    Many thanks to anybody who comments

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,334, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,998
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: Sign differences in coefficients arising from using ordinal vs continuous data


    Please better describe what was done in the past (e.g., rank?). Also, were samples comparable and models contained the same covariates? Lastly, are you finding a significant negative coefficient and they all had a positive significant coefficient. Are there any other model parameters available? Are sample sizes comparable.


    Finally, given everything is comparable, it could also be an example of replicability or researcher degree of freedom.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats