+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Support vector machines - what's the point?

  1. #1
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,227, Level: 72
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    rogojel's Avatar
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Thanked 332 Times in 312 Posts

    Support vector machines - what's the point?

    I just finished the chapter on SVMs from the Statistical Learning book of Hastie and Tibshirani. Their focus is to use the SVMs for classification - and they also show that the SVMs are equivalent to the logistic regression with nonlinear predictors (there is even an impressive exercise to drive the point home)

    Given that many more people will be familiar with logistic regression and that the logistic regression handles the nonlinearities in a much more transparent fashion, why would anyone ever chose an SVM as a classification method?


  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,374, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Not Ames, IA
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: Support vector machines - what's the point?

    I have had similar thought. I say but did not read an article on SVM regression the other day, I wish I could find it. Though, see the following two parts or three link for some insights. I always felt the interpretability and generalization of SVM was more limited.



    P.S., in about a month I am going to start reading that book from cover to cover, until then I am still drowning in work
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to hlsmith For This Useful Post:

    rogojel (05-09-2017)

+ Reply to Thread


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Advertise on Talk Stats