+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Assumptions for comparing means and which test to use

  1. #1
    Points: 5, Level: 1
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 45

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Assumptions for comparing means and which test to use




    I am attempting to compare the means of soil moisture measured from two adjacent soil profiles at both 10cm and 30cm. Soil measurements were measured discretely six times over the course of two months at the same date and time for each profile. However, when looking to perform tests to compare the means, I come across two problems: 1) is it correct to assume that the samples aren't independent because they are both influenced by precipitation in the same way as a function of time? 2) The sample sizes are small (n=6 for each depth in each profile), and they aren't normally distributed. Is there an appropriate test I can use to compare the means based on these qualifications?

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,227, Level: 72
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,470
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 332 Times in 312 Posts

    Re: Assumptions for comparing means and which test to use


    hi,
    I would go for a two-sample test, pairing each observation from one profile with the corresponding observation from the other. This could either be a t-test or a non-parametric test like Wilcoxon. However, your power will be probably low due to the small sample size.

    regards

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats