+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: Not Statistically Significant.... or is it?

  1. #16
    Devorador de queso
    Points: 97,539, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Awards:
    Posting AwardCommunity AwardDiscussion EnderFrequent PosterActivity Award
    Dason's Avatar
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    12,987
    Thanks
    309
    Thanked 2,640 Times in 2,255 Posts

    Re: Not Statistically Significant.... or is it?




    Quote Originally Posted by hlsmith View Post
    P.S., It is a little surprising all of your random samples are bigger than the mean.
    Not 2014\hspace{.1cm}
    I don't have emotions and sometimes that makes me very sad.

  2. #17
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 39,138, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,086
    Thanks
    404
    Thanked 1,196 Times in 1,157 Posts

    Re: Not Statistically Significant.... or is it?

    I was referencing that the random sample means were larger than full sample mean:


    2012: 2.42 > 2.33
    2013: 2.43 > 2.35
    2014: 2.51 > 2.43
    2015: 2.70 > 2.62
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #18
    Points: 35, Level: 1
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 15

    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Not Statistically Significant.... or is it?

    Quote Originally Posted by hlsmith View Post
    I was referencing that the random sample means were larger than full sample mean:


    2012: 2.42 > 2.33
    2013: 2.43 > 2.35
    2014: 2.51 > 2.43
    2015: 2.70 > 2.62
    That is the target group (Group A) versus ALL other students rather than an equal n sample

  4. #19
    Human
    Points: 12,972, Level: 74
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 278
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    GretaGarbo's Avatar
    Posts
    1,402
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 474 Times in 414 Posts

    Re: Not Statistically Significant.... or is it?


    First I thought that this is a typical homework. And I thought that it was supposed to be solved in the following way:

    1) do the t-test for for the difference of the GPA scores for each of the years. (What rogojel did above.) Then the standard error will be known (or at least estimated) and thus the variances of these differences.

    2) what is the sum of these differences over the 4 years? And what is the variance of that sum? (The variance of the sum is the sum of the variances. (I assume that they can be assumed to have zero correlation.)

    3) What is the mean of that sum (divide it by 4) and what is the variance of that overall mean. Then you will have the t-test for the overall mean.


    A little bit interesting is that I have no intuition if this will be significant or not. Although I have some experience as a statistician.

    Show us the result!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats