+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Comparing methods of standardising variables

  1. #1
    Points: 5,083, Level: 45
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 67

    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Comparing methods of standardising variables




    I have count data of the number scattered photons detected at various wavelengths. The data is collected under different conditions, so it is normal practice to standardise the variables. There are 3 commonly used methods to do this:

    1.) divide by the sum of squares
    2.) zero mean and unit variance
    3.) unit variance

    Does anyone have any insight and/or resources comparing the strengths/ weaknesses of these (or other) methods?

    Cheers.

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 5,246, Level: 46
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 104
    maartenbuis's Avatar
    Location
    Konstanz
    Posts
    372
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 146 Times in 123 Posts

    Re: Comparing methods of standardising variables

    I am surprised that you want to standardize at all. Your variables are counts, so the units of your variables are perfectly comparable, regardless of the conditions under which they were collected.

  3. #3
    Points: 5,083, Level: 45
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 67

    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Re: Comparing methods of standardising variables

    The experimental set-up means that the same peak at a wavenumber could be measured as 700 photons or 70000 photons - but given the same experimental conditions you would expect roughly the same photon count.

    At the moment i'm just following what is being done in the established literature, but i want to explore why it is done. The data is typically analysed by PCA or some kind of regression.

  4. #4
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 38,413, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,004
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked 1,186 Times in 1,147 Posts

    Re: Comparing methods of standardising variables

    Yeah, this most be a "field" thing, since I am also surprised by the notion of standardizing counts. As maartenbuis states, it is my impression that a key reason in continuous data is to have them all comparable for comparisons. Say you want to compare their effects.


    Another reason is to ease computations and pull down some big numbers.


    Can you provide some example data, so we can better understand what you are working with!
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  5. #5
    Points: 5,083, Level: 45
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 67

    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Re: Comparing methods of standardising variables


    Maybe this article will explain it it better. The figures are examples of the sort of data i'm looking at. Section 2.3 talks about normalisation.

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats