+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Include or Exclude a Variable in Regression ?

  1. #1
    Points: 1,959, Level: 26
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 41

    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Include or Exclude a Variable in Regression ?




    Dear all,

    Dr Timothy Z Keith advised that a new variable should not be included unless it is
    a common cause (associated with both dependent variable and factor).

    On the other hand, Dr Samprit Chatterjee suggested that we should ask 2 questions
    before such decision. Those 2 questions are :

    1) is the coefficient of the new variable significant ?
    2) Did the new variable change the coefficients of other variables substantially ?


    Finally Dr Wayne Winston suggested that our decision may be based on p values
    and t values.

    Their advice are so different, which one should I follow ?

    Thank you very much in advance.

    Sincerely
    Marty

  2. #2
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 39,072, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,075
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 1,192 Times in 1,153 Posts

    Re: Include or Exclude a Variable in Regression ?

    Depends on your purpose, if you are trying to examine a single variable, say an exposure or intervention, then Keith is right about only needing to control for confounder in that model. Controlling for other independent variables won't help you better under stand the relationship between the exposure and outcome.


    Side note, solely focusing on significance levels puts blinders on you, in a bad way. What if the pvalue is 0.055, do you ignore the variable, etc.!
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  3. #3
    Points: 1,959, Level: 26
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 41

    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Include or Exclude a Variable in Regression ?


    Quote Originally Posted by hlsmith View Post
    Depends on your purpose, if you are trying to examine a single variable, say an exposure or intervention, then Keith is right about only needing to control for confounder in that model. Controlling for other independent variables won't help you better under stand the relationship between the exposure and outcome.
    Thank you very much, hlsmith. You cleared my clouds of confusion.

+ Reply to Thread

           




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats