+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

  1. #1
    Points: 995, Level: 16
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 5

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    What is the most suitable test for survival data?




    I have a data set of two groups of individuals that I want to compare. The data contains who survived and who didn't after 40 days and after 1 year. So this is not a numerical data but a kind of 0/1 data (survive/did not survive).
    What is the test I should use?

    Thank you very much,
    Roy.

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 15,152, Level: 79
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 198
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,185
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 408 Times in 366 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    A survival analysis using interval censored data. If you have actual times for the 0/1 data (i.e., right censored data) rather than intervals, you will get a higher quality analysis.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Miner For This Useful Post:

    Royan (11-09-2017)

  4. #3
    Points: 995, Level: 16
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 5

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    Thank you very much. Do you happen to know which function does this test in R?

  5. #4
    TS Contributor
    Points: 15,152, Level: 79
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 198
    Miner's Avatar
    Location
    Greater Milwaukee area
    Posts
    1,185
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 408 Times in 366 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    Sorry. I am not an R user. Hopefully. one will respond.

    Added: I did find this article, but cannot advise whether these are the best R packages.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Miner For This Useful Post:

    Royan (11-10-2017)

  7. #5
    Human
    Points: 12,955, Level: 74
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 295
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    GretaGarbo's Avatar
    Posts
    1,401
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 474 Times in 414 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    I hope that this one and this gives you many enough packages.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to GretaGarbo For This Useful Post:

    Royan (11-10-2017)

  9. #6
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 39,045, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,070
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 1,192 Times in 1,153 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    So for clarification, your description seemed like you may not have a time variable - just group and dead: yes/no.


    For survival analysis you need the time piece as well, so the day they died, if they died. If you have this, than survival analysis can be used for say 40-day survival where you censor all non-dead at 40 days and the same thing can be done for the 1-year mark.


    However, if you just have group and death status at 40 days and then again at 1-year without the time piece, this information is less informative and you would most likely use logistic regression.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to hlsmith For This Useful Post:

    Royan (11-10-2017)

  11. #7
    Points: 995, Level: 16
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 5

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    Yes that is my case. Due to the limitations of the experiment I had limited excess and was only able to examine the subjects twice: once after 40 days and another after a year. Each time I wrote who died and who survived.
    The thing is that I feel like regression might be problem since I have only two sampling times (three if you count time 0) and that is too low right? is there an ANOVA equivalent test that can maybe help me here?

  12. #8
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 39,045, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,070
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 1,192 Times in 1,153 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    I think you are fine just running two logistic regression models:


    y (death at 40 days) = Group.


    y (death at 1 year) = Group.


    What is your sample size? Also, you will want to correct your alpha level, perhaps use 0.01, since you are conducting two comparable tests on your data sample.


    Side question, how was death status collected? If you do not have a direct source, how do you know if you missed anyone to loss to follow-up?
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  13. #9
    Points: 995, Level: 16
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 5

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    I started with 12 individuals (each) of two species of corals. the death status was collected by observation.
    I am not sure I understand. If I will run them in two separate models I am losing some data about the connection between them...? or maybe I there is something that I don't understand?
    Can I use a non-parametric rank test like Wilcoxon?

  14. #10
    Omega Contributor
    Points: 39,045, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    hlsmith's Avatar
    Location
    Not Ames, IA
    Posts
    7,070
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 1,192 Times in 1,153 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?

    If your dependent variable is binary Wilcoxon tests wouldn't work.
    Stop cowardice, ban guns!

  15. #11
    TS Contributor
    Points: 12,501, Level: 73
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 349
    rogojel's Avatar
    Location
    I work in Europe, live in Hungary
    Posts
    1,491
    Thanks
    162
    Thanked 334 Times in 314 Posts

    Re: What is the most suitable test for survival data?


    Quote Originally Posted by hlsmith View Post
    If your dependent variable is binary Wilcoxon tests wouldn't work.
    Hi hlsmith,
    how about the following idea, that could work with one continuous IV: build two groups, one for the status Dead and one for the status Survived and do a two sample test for the IV (t-test or Wilcoxon, depending). If there is a significant difference between the two groups we have a possible effect, if not then not.

    I have been wondering if this could actually work instead of a univariate logistic regression?

    regards

+ Reply to Thread

           




Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats