+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Interpreting interaction terms in multiple regression

  1. #1
    Points: 5,306, Level: 46
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 44

    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Interpreting interaction terms in multiple regression




    Hi everybody,

    I'm a master's student who's working on the last analysis for my thesis project. I'm studying possible predictors of satisfaction in women with midwife and obstetrician birth attendants. What I'm wondering is how to interpret significant interactions in multiple regression. I have attached my SPSS output as a Word document. Please look at it before reading any further.

    BA is a dichotomous variable (0=MW group, 1=OB group). I know that because the interaction terms (BA*MAST and BA*NATU) are significant, that the relationship between MAST and TOTSAT depends on level of BA, and the relationship between NATU and TOTSAT depends on level of BA. I have been doing lots of reading about interaction terms in MR (e.g., Aiken & West, 1991) and am unsure about how to properly graph the interaction terms, or if this is even necessary to make an interpretive statement.

    The way I've interpreted them (that I am unsure of) is by substituting in values of the continuous predictor variable at one SD above and below the mean in the regression equation (containing only the terms that make up the interaction and the interaction term) and then plotting the slopes for each category of the dichotomous variable (MW or OB). Doing this resulted in the following calculations for the BA*NATU interaction:

    When BA = 1 and NATU is low:
    TOTSAT = constant - .46(BA) + .36(NAT) - .37(BA*NAT)
    = 2.902 - .46(1) + .36(3.81) - .37(3.81)
    = 2.402

    When BA = 1 and NATU is high:
    TOTSAT = 2.902 - .46(1) + .36(5.59) - .37(5.59)
    = 2.382

    When BA = 0 and NATU is low:
    TOTSAT = 2.902 - .46(0) + .36(3.81) -.37(0)
    = 4.27

    When BA = 0 and NATU is high:
    TOTSAT = 2.902 - .46(0) + .36(5.59) - .37(0)
    = 4.91

    I graphed these values and interpreted the differences to mean that while a high score on NAT slightly decreases TOTSAT for the OB group, a high score on NAT increases TOTSAT for the MW group. Can someone please tell me if this is correct or if I am completely offbase here???


    Another related question I have is how should I interpret the significant (and non significant) variables that comprise the interaction terms (BA and NATU are significant, MAST is not)? I read these are referred to as the main effects, but what do they mean in the presence of a significant interaction?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks.

    K
    Attached Files

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 13,042, Level: 74
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 208
    JohnM's Avatar
    Posts
    1,948
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by K Wilson
    I graphed these values and interpreted the differences to mean that while a high score on NAT slightly decreases TOTSAT for the OB group, a high score on NAT increases TOTSAT for the MW group. Can someone please tell me if this is correct or if I am completely offbase here???


    Another related question I have is how should I interpret the significant (and non significant) variables that comprise the interaction terms (BA and NATU are significant, MAST is not)? I read these are referred to as the main effects, but what do they mean in the presence of a significant interaction?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks.

    K
    I didn't look at your attachment, but your interpretation is correct. An interaction occurs when the effect of one variable is significantly modified by another variable.

    If there are significant interactions in your model, you really can't say anything about the main effects of factors in the interaction, since they (main effects) lose meaning in the context of an interaction.

+ Reply to Thread

           




Similar Threads

  1. adding interaction terms in logistic regression
    By missElaneous in forum SPSS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-18-2009, 01:55 PM
  2. Problem interpreting Multiple Regression on Video Game Sales
    By aplfalcon in forum Regression Analysis
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 03:28 PM
  3. Dummy Variables for Interaction Terms
    By garvis in forum Statistics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 04:23 PM
  4. Interaction terms in logistic regression
    By Imicola in forum Statistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 09:28 AM
  5. Multiple Regression - Interpreting t-stat
    By big-b in forum Regression Analysis
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-29-2006, 01:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats