+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Mate Preference

  1. #1
    Points: 2,413, Level: 29
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 37

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mate Preference



    Hi guys, I'm a psychology student and my recent report is on mate preference.

    Basically the lecturer gathered data by asking everyone to write on a piece of paper our preference for a potential mate. Our own gender is indicated.

    So what I have in the end (provided by the lecturer) is a huge list of words describing characteristics of a potential mate starting from a to z.

    E.g. Cook, Charming, Dance, Elegant, Funny etc.

    Unlike previous essays or reports, the raw data are not numbers. That's where and why I'm lost.

    As far as I'm concern there's really no IV nor DV, just a collection of preferences and I was thinking descriptives instead of inferential statistics.

    However, even with descriptives, I've no idea how to go about doing this when the raw data are all words. I've thought about attaching a value to each label (word) but I'm still pretty confused.

    All help appreciated.

    Oh and I'm using SPSS.
    Last edited by Star7; 08-27-2009 at 12:37 AM. Reason: Include package use to analyze the data.

  2. #2
    Points: 2,549, Level: 30
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 51

    Location
    Iran
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I don't know much about psychology, but I think that you can assign some codes to their responses and use the number of each codes to make some inferences.

    You can compare frequencies between subgroups (divided by Gender). If you had more variables you could classify responses, and find some correlations.

    Also, You can join some resposes and derive some indices.
    Last edited by mirkamali; 08-27-2009 at 01:03 AM. Reason: Typos

  3. #3
    Super Moderator
    Points: 14,585, Level: 78
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 265
    bugman's Avatar
    Posts
    1,492
    Thanks
    88
    Thanked 139 Times in 108 Posts
    As mirkamali suggested you coul apply codes for the particualar preference. To simplify the analysis you could code several preferences (eg.funny, outgoing, chraming etc...) into one (i.e. personnality) or cook, clean etc.. into "domestic" for example. you can then count these responses and classify them by gender and then construct a contingency table test for an association between gender and attributes, say.

    Phil

  4. #4
    Points: 2,413, Level: 29
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 37

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I've thought about what both of you had said and I've an article that might provide some help.

    I've found an article whereby factor analysis was conducted to reveal the underlying structure of 76 preferences.

    The analysis yield 9 factors: Kind-Considerate, Socially Exciting, Artistic-Intelligent, Religious, Domestic, Professional Status, Likes Children, Politically Conservative and Easygoing-adaptable.

    What I have in mind is to code each of those labels into values, 1-9. Gender would be 1-2.

    I'll proceed to enter the gender first, followed by categorizing the respective preference into one of those nine categories.

    Something like
    Gender: 1 (female)
    Preferences: 5 (domestic - can cook)

    With this I can enter everything into SPSS as numbers and possible explore gender differences in mate preference.

    However, here's the problem, every person (male or female) wrote down an unlimited number of preferences, by entering data in this manner, I would definitely inflate the number of males and females. Would this be a problem?

    What method of analysis would you suggest then, for a comparison of gender differences? 2 categorical variables - Chi sq? I'm not sure.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator
    Points: 14,585, Level: 78
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 265
    bugman's Avatar
    Posts
    1,492
    Thanks
    88
    Thanked 139 Times in 108 Posts
    Factor analysis is good for finding the most important variables (the ones that explain the most amount of the total variance in the data set). This is ususally followed by further analysis. One option is path analysis (this might suit your data set - see link below) or as previously mentioned, the factors (if they are counts) can be analysed in a cross-tab format.

    http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/path.htm


    Im not quite sure what you mean by inflating the number of males and females

  6. #6
    TS Contributor
    Points: 7,313, Level: 56
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 37
    CowboyBear's Avatar
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,190
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts
    Star - this really sounds to me like a qualitative research project, I think the folks have made some good suggestions but perhaps you need to look at the problem from a different angle - a lot of great qualitative research goes on in psychology, it's important not to force everything into being a "number" problem. One technique that *might* work is content analysis, which sorta toes the line between quantitative and qualitative research. (Qualitative research definitely isn't my area, but just a suggestion!)

  7. #7
    Points: 2,413, Level: 29
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 37

    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    To Bugman: Well I was thinking of using the results from the FA conducted by other researchers to base my data on.

    Regarding the inflation of males and females, it goes something like this:
    For example, if a female wrote down 5 preferences, when I enter the data, it would be something like this:

    Gender, Preferences
    1, 3
    1, 2
    1, 5
    1, 4
    1, 6

    Instead of 1 female, there would be 5 >.<

    To CowboyBear: Yea I've thought about it being a qualitative project, but because I've had no experience with qualitative projects, I thought I'll try to do it the "number" way. >.<

  8. #8
    Super Moderator
    Points: 14,585, Level: 78
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 265
    bugman's Avatar
    Posts
    1,492
    Thanks
    88
    Thanked 139 Times in 108 Posts

    You treat it as multivariate data (as in Factor analysis) so that instead of:

    1,3
    1,4
    1,5 etc...


    it reads,

    male 1: 1,2,5,6
    male 2: 1,5
    female 1: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
    female 2: 1,3,4,5

    etc...

    This shouldn't be a problem in factor analysis

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Is this a test of preference?
    By JonnyB in forum Statistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-09-2011, 05:04 PM
  2. Preference testing and physiological cues
    By DaveC in forum Psychology Statistics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 05:40 PM
  3. Preference - which statistical method?
    By scully101 in forum Statistical Research
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 02:38 PM
  4. Program Preference for Logistic Regression
    By vglnT in forum Statistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-23-2010, 01:56 PM
  5. Non-independence of data in preference studies
    By jonesor in forum Statistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 12:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts








Advertise on Talk Stats