+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Fisher's Exact Test

  1. #1
    Points: 4,583, Level: 43
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 167

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Fisher's Exact Test




    Hello,

    I'm currently a doctoral candidate in wildlife ecology. I'm analyzing habitat selection data for bullsnakes collected over three years.

    Initially, I ran a chi-squared test to determine if observed habitat use differed from expected values. However, I have several expected values below 5, and several observed cells with zeros. I was told that perhaps a Fishers exact test would be the best way to analyze my data.

    However, I can't conform to a 2X2 contigency table. I have to analyze habitat use data for males and females in 14 different habitat types...and repeat these analyses for 2003, 2004, 2005.

    At any length, I'm having trouble determining: (a) if this will work for me and (b) if there is a statistical software package available that can analyze it.

    Thank you for your time,
    Josh

  2. #2
    TS Contributor
    Points: 13,042, Level: 74
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 208
    JohnM's Avatar
    Posts
    1,948
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Even though your data violates some of the criteria for using chi-square, and since it sounds like you cannot combine categories or whittle(sp?) it down to a 2x2 table, then I would just run a chi-square anyway....and see how it goes.

    I don't think you have many other options....

  3. #3
    Points: 4,583, Level: 43
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 167

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks, John.

    In the chi-squared analysis, what should I do in habitat types where I have no observations (ie, zero in the observed cells)? Eliminate them for that analysis?

    I'm assuming I can run a G-stat test (logliklihood analysis) to "correct" the fact that several of my expected values are below 5.

    Thanks,
    Josh

  4. #4
    Points: 4,583, Level: 43
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 167

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hi John,

    I know you must be ridiculously busy, but I was just curious if you had gotten a chance to think about my previous question?

    Thanks alot for your time,
    Josh

  5. #5
    TS Contributor
    Points: 13,042, Level: 74
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 208
    JohnM's Avatar
    Posts
    1,948
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    I would keep them in the analysis. Just because your sample is a 0, doesn't necessarily mean that it will always be 0.

  6. #6
    Points: 4,583, Level: 43
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 167

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM
    I would keep them in the analysis. Just because your sample is a 0, doesn't necessarily mean that it will always be 0.
    Thanks for the reply, John.

    Just curious: isn't it a prerequisite for chi-squared tests that observed values can't be zero...in other words, no "observed" cells can have a value of zero? Thought I read that somewhere, but could be completely wrong.

    Thanks...I should be just about done pestering you.

    Josh

  7. #7
    TS Contributor
    Points: 13,042, Level: 74
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 208
    JohnM's Avatar
    Posts
    1,948
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Not that I'm aware of....

  8. #8
    Points: 4,583, Level: 43
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 167

    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks, John!

    Josh

  9. #9
    Points: 65, Level: 1
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 35

    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Fisher's Exact Test


    Hello John,
    You seem very knowledgeable and I was really hoping you could help me.
    I have a 2x4 table with nominal data (the columns are simply YES/NO, the rows are four categories)

    Category A: 7, 13
    Category B: 15, 5
    Category C: 15, 5
    Category D: 19, 1

    I am hoping to test the significance of a couple of the categories to each other (2x2), but also to assess the significance of the whole table (2x4, although I am not really sure how to interpret the meaning of the significance here).

    I understand that as my sample sizes are small (as you can see, Category D features "1" under NO, and each category has only 20 people) so I should be using Fisher's Exact Test. Is this correct? Can Fishers also be used in a 2x4? And what does it mean if this result is significant?

    Many thanks!

+ Reply to Thread

           




Similar Threads

  1. Cramer's V & Phi or Fisher's exact test?
    By micdhack in forum SPSS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-08-2011, 02:24 PM
  2. Reporting of Fisher's exact test??
    By stephsports in forum SAS
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-02-2010, 06:22 PM
  3. Fisher's Exact Test?
    By purplehibiscus in forum Statistics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-17-2009, 09:07 AM
  4. Fisher's exact test
    By zeta09 in forum Biostatistics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2009, 08:24 PM
  5. When to use Fisher's exact test
    By dfrisch in forum Statistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-25-2008, 01:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts






Advertise on Talk Stats